p

uralic

Menu


WWII - Red Sunow in Karelia

War of Independence

Antti's WWII Photo Gallery

Early Finnish History

Uralic Historical Maps

   Finnish:

  • University of Victoria BC,  Canada - CFUV (Pirkko)
  • Finnish Streaming radio

  • Finnish Christian TV

       Healing Prayers (Fin.)

  • Finnish Streaming radio

  • Finnish locomotives

  • Finnish Newspapers

  • Karjala Lehti

  • Karjalankuvalehti

  • Finland For Thought

  • Finland on the Internet

  • History of Finland

  • Prokarelia

  • Lokarin Linkit -USA

  • Finnish Courses in Vancouver

  • Maahanmuuttopolitiikka

  • Karelia:

  • Kvenland

  • Karelia Klubi

  • Tie Karjalaan - Road to Karelia

  • Korela

  • ProKarelia - repatriation

  • Future of Karelian language

    Uh
  • Finno-Ugric and related:

  • Finno-Ugrian heritage in Russia

  • Uralic and Finno-Ugric Resources - Finland

  • Multiculturalism Lie

  • Uralic and Finno-Ugric Resources - Estonia

  • Innovative view of Uralics

  • Video history of Uralic peoples

  • Saami of Lapland

  • Origin of Saami

  • Saami - Finnish genetics

  • Estonian Institute

  • Languages:

  • Comparison of Finnish and Hungarian

  • Dictionaries of the world

  • Intertran Text Translator

  • Uralic Dictionary

  • Learn Finnish online

  • Learn Finnish

  • Estonian - English - Dictionary

  • Genealogy:

  • Genealogical Society of Finland

  • Church of Finland

  • Bible Search

  • Vancouver BC Church

  • Finnish Orthodox Church

  • EU and Christianity

  • Finns in America:

  • Finnish Emigration

  • Finnish Citizenship


  • Finnish US Organizations


  • Finnish Canadian Organizations

  • Music: Pirkko, UVic

  • Music Page: Karelian, Finnish; New: historical mp3's



    YOUR FOOD & HEALTH



  • Aspertame Crime against humanity

  • The Beautiful Truth

  • GMO Food Scam

  • Cancer: big business

  • A Canadian Nurse cured cancer

  • Dr. Hoxsey Cures cancer

  • Various Cancer Modalities

  • A doctor's advise

  • A doctor's advise 2

  • Broccoli switches cancer off.

  • Vaccines cause Autism

  • Devine healing (Fin.)

  • Bad Obama: sneaking in GMO deregulation

  • Dismantling America

  • Bill Gates: vaccine murder.

  • Protein cause of cancer

  • Peasall Sisters Sing

  • Little Bit Country Music

  • Via Dolorosa

  • Little Wolf Biomass Stove

  • Israel

  • Charis Bible College

  • Creation or Evolution?



  • LINKS PAGE


    © Osmo Joronen 1998-2014

    All Rights reserved














































































































































    finno-ugric

    Last Updated: November 1, 2014

    Finnish and Related People's History,
    Culture and Language











    Welcome! Tervetuloa!






    Share on Facebook
      Search This Site



      Finland and Finnish People's History, Culture and Future


      Topics: Maps, culture, history, pictures, language, literature, listen to music, songs, products, human rights, WWII, Finnish web radio in Finland and Canada, news; Uralic City Center - where you can find books, CDs, Videos etc. and lots more on the way. Land aquisitions by Russia 1944-45.

      Microsoft and Nokia






      The Ruling Elite's Plans To Destroy Us Progress Report

      On November 30, 1939, my father, who had been drafted five months earlier into the Finnish Army, stood with his fellow Finns against a giant evil empire: The Soviet Union. The world watched as a tiny northern country fought on skiis and Sisu to remain free. We won the battles in the forests of Karelia but lost the war and our beloved Karelia, the home of my ancestors. My family had to move out of the way of the invading Soviet Army along with 450,000 other Karelians. This evil "spirit" from the East, moved westward after the fall of Communism, and is now trying to destroy Europe or anyone getting in the way, with its new weapon: destroy the current society by aborting their next generation(s) and bring in the new society by increasing Muslim immigration. The problem is that the ideology they bring with them can destroy our nation. Nobody asks what ideology you are bringing into the country, because it is locked inside the brain, so it is hard to control. Just as we would not allow Nazis to immigrate to Finland, we must be aware that there is one religion with similar totalitarian characteristics including hatred of Jews and freedom of speech. Palestinian people celebrate, pass out candies and are extatic when innocent praying Rabbis are barbarically murdered with meat cleavers. How then is Islam a religion of peace when their people are daily proving the opposite? There is massive denial of the true causes of not just terrorism but other Muslim disobedience and crime as well in the Northern countries and I would like to know who is behind it, and they should be arrested and tried for treason. Here is an ideology that claims to be a religion, that locks people in once they are there, under penalty of death. What shall we do with such an ideology, welcome it into our country, or disallow it? Muhammad said kill unbelievers and anyone who has left his religion

      Muslim violence increasing around the world.
      P

      Vancouver BC is 1/3 Chinese. It became clear very early what their ideology was: prosperity! They had no ideology of "taking over and replacing a culture" which is a key doctrine in Islam and is in full swing right now. They did their own thing and were an asset. That is not the case with Muslims in France or Britain. They are trying to impose their religion within the country as some of the videos and links show and breaking the laws of the land. This is a direct threat on the nation from within. It begins by imposing it on their own but it conflicts with our free society to treat women for example as lower class citizens and free speech. It eventually destroys Christianity, and it has everywhere in history. Most of the Muslim countries were Christian, and this now applies to Europe. We are in mortal danger from this religion, yet we fight for their cause beside them. It is clear to me that not all immigration is the same value to a prosperous and free society, unfortunately. The bottom line: only you can decide what to believe. Make sure you are believing the truth by avoiding the politically correct version and biased reporting, which is your local news. Make sure that you are not watching an Arab news such as CNN. Oil money is buying our sources of information! I will provide various links for your consideration so you don't fall in the Arab trap.
      Honest Reporting

      The following is about Islam, not Muslims. This is very important because we discuss Muhammad and the eventual devastating effects of this doctrine and culture on every country it has entered. Why do we automatically go against our own better understanding and for something which paints Islam with the politically correct brush, which is false? What use is false information? Why do we prevent free discussion about dangerous ideologies? When trying to define Islam and Radical Islam, it becomes clear that they are one and the same, except for one difference: one is not yet willing to act, but that can and is changing without notice. There is the actual problem with this ideology today and Brigitte Gabriel of Act for America has estimated that over 20% of Muslims are sympathetic to the cause of Jihad which is to take over the world for Islam. Many others are active in stealth Jihad which is misinformation about Islam and its true nature. Don't confuse "Islam" and "Muslim" - one is an ideology and the other is a victim of it.

      There are several key bits of information that everyone must know to make any sense of what Muslims are doing around the world, such as kidnapping girls, blowing up their children to kill a few infidels, ISIS cruel methods of warfare etc. Shariah Law is the key to understanding Islam, and most Muslims have no idea what is in it. Shariah destroyed Christianity (=freedom) everywhere it exists today and this must be prevented if we want to remain free. Shariah in a nutshell.

      Muhammad had slaves. Slaves in the Bible were mostly servants paying off a debt. They had to be released after seven years. Not so with Islam, no captives are released and there is no leaving that religion under penalty of death. If we do not help them out of it, somehow, they or their children can eventually turn against us.

      This could be Helsinki in ten years:
      Muslims blocking streets in Paris to pray, while police are told to not interfere. It is a provocation, a dare.

      This following video illustrates how dumb the Northern countries have become from absorbing all the crap dished out by the leftist governments and their news partners:


      Fiercely independent, Finns will not bow to be anyone's slaves. That spirit is carried forward in this page, but it conflicts with political correctness so be aware. I can see trouble ahead if Finland continues its present policies, including immigration from Muslim countries. There is nothing wrong with individual Muslims; they are nice people. There is something not right about their ideology. There is nothing racist or hate in legitimate concerns about dangerous ideologies. What kind of religion makes anyone who is brave enough to speak the truth about it a hunted man with a price on his head? Only Islam. And what are we as a nation doing protecting a religion of war? No, it is not a religion of peace, and never was. There are peaceful Muslims but Islam itself is a warlike, evil fascist ideology. If the government doesn't know that by now, we need to change governments. You cannot escape evil by ignoring it. Eventually it will overtake you. It is time to face it now. Nothing that the forces of evil have used against us, including Communism and Fascism, has worked as well as the present deception, as the influx of Muslims is not viewed as any danger whatsoever. The truth is that we can learn from the mistakes of Sweden, Britain and France as examples of what is in store for us. The problem is, the government and news are not reporting as they should, and they have a lot to answer for in the near future because they are remiss in their duty to inform the people of the negative effects of promoting present European immigration practices. Everyone is entitled to being treated fairly, but we have a problem just the same and we need to deal with it. Stop labeling people with contrary opinions with those labels that the politically correct crowd wants you to use to destroy free expression, such as "Fascist" and "Islamophobe" to name a few. These people are so dumb they don't know the true meanining of these words. You don't have to be sheep led to your slaughter so go your own way; look at the facts, and make up your own mind, please. Europe is headed for a Muslim takeover and that means the military as well. It isn't happening tomorrow, but that is where we are slowly but surely going. Now is the time to act, not 20 years from now. Government contempt of Constitution and the people's will. US speech about Obama the dictator. A lesson for us all.
      The Plot To Destroy Us Exposed Geert Wilders:


      Dr. Bill Warner, a fellow engineering type, (though I am also a biologist but with a career in civil engineering) lectures on Radical Islam, not about Muslims! Why is it that students must be retaught everything they learn in university by scientists and engineers? They come out of these institutions dangerous! Full of crap if you ask me, and that is what is ruining perfectly good countries such as France, Britain and Sweden. Now they are in trouble thanks in part to academics with their heads in the clouds. You might have heard of the riots in Malmo Sweden, the Shariah Law courts in Britain, and no go zones in the Muslim areas. You see they are conquering ground! Wake up buddy, most of the stuff you've learned about Islam is fiction...fiction. Why don't the history teachers teach the correct version of history? It isn't rocket science, but it is pure fact, based on research data. Perhaps because scientists only deal with facts, and can smell bad data a mile away, especially when they try to feed you obvious false material, such as Islam is a peaceful religion. It never was, so why ever whisper it? Politically correct data would make planes crash and bridges collapse! Listen to an engineer or a scientist and forget the rest, well maybe a Christian who has scientific or other fact only based background. We do not discuss Muslims, the victims of Islam.



      I firmly believe that political correctness is killing us. It is putting a muzzle on people's mouths so that important issues cannot be discussed openly and freely, without reservation. We cannot fight a battle on two fronts, one of which is political correctness. We must choose or loose the battle against whatever threat there be. Islam is a proven threat. Our free world depends on freedom to discuss all issues and therefore I say we the people scrap it and all of us in unison begin to say what we know is right, not what the government wants us to say. News on TV and related programs that drive an agenda is just baby food. We are not all babies, but many are. The government has their own agenda that is different from the people's, and they don't want us to know what that is in most cases. Go ahead, be brave; raise a few eyebrows. Make the government mad by contradicting them; stirr the pot but speak the truth, and do not compromise it. Just remember that we humans are gullible and naive regarding the intention of our leaders who many believe have our best interests in mind. That's what the German people and slaves of USSR thought. You can be sure they are up to no good, and must be watched by us and made to do our will, which is peace and prosperity - not strife and death. Two world wars saw 100 million people killed. Add Stalin's murders, all approved by the people...well they say they had no idea these things were going on... Let us never again say we don't know what is going on, when the information is at your finger-tips. Take advantage of it because you can never say "I didn't know" or "I did't think they would come for me" or "I saw the warnings on line but I decided to believe our leaders, they should know" and give these as the excuses for doing nothing. Evil thrives where good men do nothing. Dr. Benjamin Carson

      Ok, here's the deal: we are again under attack, but we have failed to recognize it as an attack because we are looking for an army to confront. We will not see an army in the conventional sense, but it is an invasion just the same. The enemy has carefully found our weaknesses: where we are gullible and can be tricked. Consequently valuable time has been lost because of this. Our news media is the worst offender in assisting the enemy. They have painted the immigration of Muslims into Europe as a beautiful "multicultural experience" that we will all benefit from. Yet Germany's Merckel has proclaimed that experiment a colossal failure. We should not be experimenting with Islam like children should not play with fire. Why? Because we have no idea what we are doing! The damage is irreversible; you can't just say oops, we made a mistake, let's undo it. No. We have made a big mistake, and now we will see the results. Can we reverse or at least mitigate further damage? I don't know but not trying is not an option. We don't have much time. The first step is to stop this nonsense of denying Islam is behind all the lone wolf attacks and groups like ISIS, and it has violence at its core that is infectious like a disease, and it infects a lot of angry young men and women. And these people are going out to fight against us with the likes of ISIS and returning to do mischief at home. Do we really want to pretend Islam is peaceful, a religion based on 6th Century Arabian morality and pagan religions where eye for eye and internal warfare reigns supreme? Where women are worth maybe one-half of a man if they are lucky and raped women are condemned to death? It is a recipe for chaos in any country where there are more than 7-8% Muslims, because then Islamic law prevails in their zones and local law is made of no use there as is Britain and France.

      Attempts to democratize (reform) Islamic systems have all failed, and will always fail as long as Islam is used as a template for government. Thousands of lives have been wasted just because we do not understand Islam. Enormous amount of concessions have been given just because we don't understand that we are slowly cutting our own throats. Isn't it time? The new Pearl Harbor was in New York September 11, 2001. But that is just the beginning of the problems facing Amaerica. US now has a Muslim president (He has said so on many occasions, but just to his Muslim buddies. To us he affirms his Christian faith.) and all obstacles have been removed for Islam to move forward, in school text books, in training manuals about terrorism, Islam has been removed as the cause etc. etc. There couldn't be a better opportunity for Islam in the world to achieve their goals unopposed. At least in the 16th and 17th Centuries in France and Austria they opposed the Muslim armies and drove them back. Now we welcome them, but why? We love Muslims, Buddhists, Sikhs, and what have you, some of who have escaped the clutches of dictatorial Islamic governments and Shariah Law, but we do not like Islam for the same reasons many escaped. The main reason is that they want to establish those same systems in our countries, and we don't like them because they discriminate against women and have deceit, aggression and violence under a peaceful facade, the very things some claim are not a part of the religion. Everything is fair game in spreading the religion. The bottom line: don't listen to heads of state or the evening news for knowledge about Islam. They preach lies, and my job as I see it is to prove that to you - the onus is on me.
      The Battle in America

      Today in the post-9/11 world, I have been drafted by my conscience, to fight ignorance and deception of the new enemy that works by stealth and to give a balance to the one-sided reporting by the media that enculturates our people to believe or disbelieve whatever they choose. They have chosen poorly, and other than reporting specific news events, the world news is biased and always predictable because it comes from the same corrupt sources. For example, Islam is peaceful, Terrorism is no longer called "Islamic" and Israel kills innocent Palestinians, but not the other way around. The bad Israelis are stealing Palestinian land etc. except most of these "Palestinians" have settled in the area from other Arab countries just as the Israelis and are not Palestinians. They are settlers. Most peaceful Palestinians would rather live and work with the Israelis because they are paid and treated very well but these settlers already hate Israelis because of their brainwashing. Israelis in Palestinian areas are not safe. The good will is on the Israeli side and completely missing on the other. I plan to go into some eye-opening information for you here, that will undoubtedly make you angry that you have been lied to by the people you are supposed to trust - your leaders. Obama, a Muslim, is the worst of them all as the following link will show. He is not your friend - in fact an enemy collaborator - believe me, and it baffles me how this silver-fork tongued snake ever got elected twice. He had made an effort early in his career to get people to think he was a Christian, but when he was elected he was going around telling all his Arab friends that he is one of them! He even gave the banned terrorist organization Muslim Brotherhood $1.3 billion dollars of American money that he had to borrow. A blind and deaf population is the worst thing for a country, and my goal is to open the eyes and ears of the Finnish people, but also the world in peril. Fighting ignorance and fraud in reporting.

      If you have bought the biased reports, you need to keep reading. The doctrines of Islam in the Hadith are interpreted by many Muslims doing all the murders as their religious permission to kill infidels in exchange for guarantees of paradise. That is how it was intended to be interpreted, and the only way they could be. They are clear and unmistakable contrary to claims by peaceful Muslims. Kill means kill. Reward means reward - in paradise. That is the problem with this religion and nothing can change it. This is like putting a price on killing innocent people. To claim Islam does not counsel anyone to kill, will not change anything as long as there are people willing to obey athe written text. On October 24, 2014 the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation news stated that the Muslim who killed a soldier at Parliament Hill the day before had been taught the radical version of Islam. Does anyone know what that is? What was he taught? Was it from the Quran, Hadith or some other book, or maybe from someone's own mind? It is imperative we know the answer so we don't just believe what we have been told. So far it has all been a lie. Having extreme thoughts, it was announced is something that you can't go to jail for. But if you are in possession of documents that encourage killing innocent people, could anyone be jailed for that? Every day Muslims are reading such a document. Converts to Islam don't have to go to radical web sites to be radicalized; just go to the Quran and Hadith and follow Muhammad's example in his conquests. Fraudulent religion?

      We have no defenses against deception and ignorance except knowledge. We have to step up and call a spade a spade and deal with the consequences. That is the correct path, but we (the west) refuse to follow it, preferring to live a lie, and this lie is about to bite us as the predicted collapse the the US economy will soon prove, possibly by July 2015 as predicted by those that know the sad situation. When every tough situation is not faced, we are one more step closer to disaster. When printing money solves the immediate problem, it makes inevitable a collapse. The expected 25 year US depression, the result of dishonest financial practices will also affect Finland. I am saying this because it is a symptom of deeper problem. If there is no God, why be honest, why not just regress to being an animal that we supposedly are; why preserve the life of an unborn child? Ah, but that is the biggest lie that is the mother of all the rest.

      Anyway, today's second biggest lie is "peaceful" Islam. There is no such thing, although there are many peaceful "Muslims" - if you can call a person who doesn't follow Muhammad's Jihad command a Musli. Now home-grown Jihadists are a growing threat all over the world. They know us but we do not understand them. We still think they are doing all the violence as part of some unknown doctrine separate from Islam, which is no different than Christianity. But they are exact opposites. Christianity is "love thy neighbor" but Islam is "chop infidel heads off" and do not make friends with infidels unless it serves your purpose to advance Islam. Lying to advance Islam contrasts with Christian law against "bearing false witness."

      All attacks should be reported by the news for what they are: rooted in the real Islam, not some aberrant form. Islam is Islam. Commentary on the killing of Canadian soldiers was that this killing is not of the mainstream Islam, but "sectarian." This means that following Muhammad's command for Jihad is sectarian, and not following him is mainstream. Please spend a few minutes and determine the truth for yourself at Tom Wallace's website.
      Thomas Jefferson's War on Islamic Pirates - terror on the high seas.

      Listening to leaders discuss or make statements about Islam reveals either their lack of knowledge or willful deception. What is happening both sides of the Atlantic with our permission is disgusting. Terrorism has turned normal people into cowards, willing to cave into all manner of demands that drastically change the foundations of our culture. Shariah Law in Britain? That's just one of the previously inconceivable events. Facts are few and far between in the secular media so I am following alternative sources close to the event s and knowledge based on first-hand witness information. Why feed your mind with lies; it would be better that you didn't read or watch the News than be a walking repository of a bunch of lies. It is time to grow up and stop believing in the tooth fairy! May as well watch cartoons; you'll probably profit more than from your daily political correctness. So how can we get some truth? From sources not involved in driving an agenda that has been thought up by someone that does not have our interests in mind. Start here...

      There is so much confusion about Islam because politicians, save for a very few, are by nature born liars. They are smooth talkers and most people accept what they say as gospel. If they lie, then I suspect they are working against us, and for the enemy. Most of the US Congress is now corrupt, having joined with the Multinationals against the people, supporting such things as Genetically Modified Food, which is killing millions of people. It is the gospel of snakes. The founding fathers were right: a democratic democracy does not work if the people do not have a strong foundation in moral conduct, which lasted until around the time of the Vietnam War and the beginning of abortion.

      After 9/11, every politician in the western world joined the same refrain begun by George Bush that echoed around the world: "Islam is a religion of peace." That is called "The Big Lie." My information is that he was told to say that by his oil buddies, the Arabs. (Robert Morey 2001) Oil makes gasoline and grease, and the money sure greases a lot of decisions. Obama's recent stock comment they all use: "No religion condones the killing of innocent people." Except this Arabian warrior religion redefined the meaning of "innocent" like another liar president Bill Clinton who redefined "sexual relations" to try and save himself. According to the Quran infidels are not innocent but friends of Satan who must be killed. When these young men kill infidels, they think it is Allah's will and they will get points. These points are critical in Islam because Muslims are not saved by grace, like Christians, but only by works. The most points that guarantees heaven is dying for Allah. In fact Muhammad deported and executed Jews (one famous event: 900 decapitated - murdered - for not accepting Islam) in Arabia. Ethnically cleansed, the Jews of Arabia were all but wiped out, a few converting to Islam. Yet American kids are taught in school that Muslims lived in peace with their Christian and Jew neighbors - thanks to Obama's Muslim Brotherhood advisors. Islamic Kumbayaa! What a joke - on America. Muslims are bigger liars than some of our western leaders, if not directly then by omission. You will never hear about what Muhammad the warrior taught regarding killing. Jesus did not kill; Muhammad killed. He was a real Arab Genghis Khan. Islam's holy book is in part not just about killing and warfare but also rape of innocent girls, (Robert Morey 2001) that is now again continuing:

        "Let those who exchange the life of this world for the hereafter, fight for the cause of Allah; whether they die or conquer, We shall richly reward them...The true believers fight for the cause of Alah, but the infidels fight for idols. Fight then against the friends of Satan" (Sura 4:74 and 76) Writers of the time describe what Muslim warriors did to girls, and it is awful. They became sex slaves.

        Dr. Anis Shorosh on the real Islam


      I read historical accounts of how Muhammad's army treated the captured women, but it is too gross to put here how they prolonged the innocent girls' agony at their hands. The pleasure they got from forcing themselves on them makes a civilized person feel like cutting off their violating part. I wonder how much killing by Islamists (those who follow Muhammad to the letter) will it take before we wake up and say, hei, did you know it was Muhammad's command to kill infidels who will not convert, or who resist in any way? And the spoils of conquest were also women. Doesn't that make you think young men joined for that reason, for their selfish pleasures? Then why are Most Muslims peaceful? The same reason why most "Christians" don't go to church.

      Muslim leaders (for example in Brussels) recently claimed they will be in control of Europe in a few years, and that it is not a theory but a certainty. How can they claim that; we would resist! Think again. If there is any resistance, it must be now or never as the invasion is in full swing. There is no point taking action when the war has been lost, and fighting to prevent it in Afghanistan and Iraq will not prevent it at home. The war is lost in France and England, and Islamization is in progress with Shariah Law in force and Islam "no go" zones have signs warning that Muslim customs must be observed. Gangs patrol the streets and dispense their hatred on the population. This sounds like a nightmare but it is happening with the approval of the governments concerned, for fear of being called racists. That fear is driving our demise.

      So where can we find out what is actually happening regarding that sensitive subject of Islam? Right here is a good place to start. Those controlling the agenda, the political elite, also control what critical information reaches the public, and it is not. They try to prevent freedom of speech under the excuse that they are keeping the peace. Eternal vigilance is the price of freedom. The public only gets what a few people want the rest to know so there is a deficiency of correct information really at all levels even health issues. For example the maximum protein and sugar in diets are way too high in America, meaning factual information is blocked. (See sidebar for link) We need correct information about everything, and we are not getting it because of conflicts with other agendas! Usually they are corrupt agendas with money and power at the root. Freedom depends on the willingness of the people to make moral decisions. This is lacking in our new culture, especially our leaders and generally in the west not just Finland. Culture infuses across borders and Finns have received lots.

      We have become "nonjudgmental." You might say that is good. Think again; it isn't. We must be able to discern between adaptive behavior and ideology that means survival, and maladaptive behavior and ideology that means extinction of our kind. We think only Christians are judgmental, but that is false. Everyone is judgmental but often of the wrong things: the good and pure and righteous. (Not self-righteous) Not everything is for our benefit. We believe in and do what destroy us: eat and drink things that hurt us in so many ways, and do immoral things that we know are wrong but have killed our conscience to them. We can't tell the difference anymore. If you can, great, but most cannot or we would get rid of abortion that destroys us and our next generation. Besides it is killing despite the fact that we have convinced ourselves of the lie that it is just a lump of tissue. Lies! For example without judgement, there would still be slavery and child labor in America and much more, and would you let your young daughter go out with a drug addict? Nazism and Communism would have won. The fact is, as evil acts by believers in the tenants of Islam attest, it is a fertile ground for Satan's work. The death of judgement and outrage means failure to recognize and confront what is necessary and God help us if we fail. What I am getting at is that we should exercise good judgement that will provide the best free and prosperous society in the future, if there is a future. If we don't stop killing the unborn, there won't be. If you remove all the unintended pregnancies from Finnish history, we would have been overrun by enemies hundreds of years ago. Save our children and let's have a future.

      The establishment of internal threats (Islam) is used by Fascist leaning political elite to take away our freedoms and demolish the Constitution. Obama thumbs his nose at the American Constitution. The educators better get their heads straight and teach the kids what is going on. Are you sure that the current demographic shift and it's acceptance by the people, is not a plan to create an internal threat in Finland and the rest of Europe? (Both internal and external threats being required in a Fascist state.) That was actually my first thought when it started after Kekkonen. You have to ask: who is benefitting from it, the people or the ruling elite's agenda? Our western democracy is broken now, having strayed too far from its original vision of freedom for all. The United States was founded as "one nation under God." Whether the US Founding Fathers were Christians or not is academic. What is important though is that they all knew that Christian values were imperative in the population and most importantly the leaders, to create the free and prosperous Repulic of The United States of America. Our western cultures are rapidly losing those values and I maintain we must return to them or face the consequences, which are not pretty. Europe included! As for Finland, we don't have to allow our politicians to ruin our country just because other countries are willing to. See End of America - Naomi Wolf

      This is a fight for hearts and minds against enemy propaganda and we better be on the winning side and know what happens if we aren't. Our survival depends on seeking the truth and acting on it, and rejecting the one-sided propaganda barrage we are receiving from the media. They have been encouraging us to accept the politically correct versions of truth, which is really not what we need to know. We need to know firstly if Islam is a religion of peace or war and why some are peaceful and some are not. This is a foundational fact of Islam: it must be the world's master religion. Eight decades ago, we were faced with another threat: Nazism, which believed that the Germanic "master race" must rule the world and other races must be exterminated Darwinian style. The only difference in Islam is that the subject is religion rather than race. See the similarity? Both are driven by a dangerous ideology we must oppose. In fact the two are very similar in many ways including brutality when Muhammad's example is followed. It is given in the Quran but rarely mentioned by peaceful Muslims. When hateful Muslim Jihadists point out Muhammad's doctrine of hate to confused and lost youth, they can become radicalized. It also gives youths with a grudge against western society a way to strike back - very appealing to these people. This is not about hating people but an ideology called Islam which our survival depends on understanding thoroughly, not by the politically correct media but by other reliable sources.

      Not all Muslims believe that they should begin taking over the world by force, but that is changing - fast. Just see how many young men from all countries but especially US and Britain are our enemies, fighting for ISIS ideology and coming back home to continue the fight. How many more are sympathetic but never go to Iran but are involved in stealth Jihad to change our system at home? Shariah Law is now in Britain. That is crazy! Since the days of the Crusaders that went to the Holy Land to protect the Christians, nothing has changed except the Muslims have conquered more territory. We are still going over there to protect someone and ultimately ourselves. I am telling you that you need to know that Islam is the source of the violence. Don't listen to the politically correct politicians that are trying to tell us otherwise. The message I want you to get is that although this is true, we don't blame Muslims. They are victims of being brainwashed from the cradle, being forced to pray five times a day and all that. They need to be rescued, not hated. They already think Allah is God, so it is not that hard to lead them out of a religion of hate and violence to one of peace, prosperity and happiness that we in the West have enjoyed but which has eluded the Muslim world of violence and slavery to Allah. They put the blame on us; I put the blame on their ideology. We are in a battle of good against evil, not good against good. We must defend the good and destroy the bad.

      We must demand from our leaders zero compliance with Islamic Laws: "Respect the Local culture and stop trying to change it to the mess that you left back home. Stop trying to change us!" This the demand by Canadians and it should be of Finns as well. Too bad the Brits weren't smart enough to prevent their Shariah disaster. They should reverse the decision immediately.

      Islamic threat for Europe - I examine whether Islam is a religion of peace or war and whether Allah is the god of the Bible as some claim, and the implications for the future of Europe and in particular, Finland. This site is not about slandering any group of people. It is about truth, but sometimes casting some things in a less than good light may seem like hate or lies initially until it becomes clear that what was thought to be false is actually true. Such is the case with Islam: we think of it as just another religion and we should not say anything that might be construed as just pure hate speech. That concern is long over as we are becoming more informed not through the media or our politically correct leaders, but the vast information available on the Internet. What is actually contained deep in the religion is really scary, and it comes from Muhammad. Most Muslims do not go that deep into their religion if at all. What is not understood is that there are two sides to Islam. The first, earlier writings are relatively peaceful, and we get quoted from these verses, deceptively. However, what they don't tell you is that the doctrine of abrogation wiped those away and replaced them with militant, kill the infidel ideas. The early writings were left there on purpose, to confuse the enemy, and it is working. I don't blame people for thinking Islam is peaceful because it is carefully crafted to deceive. But we shouldn't be stuck there. Everything I state here can be confirmed there.

      One of the main problems of Finland and indeed all of European society is reproductive failure, the inability maintain our numbers, which are in a free fall. The solution has been immigration. That is not fixing the problem! That is making it worse. The way to actually deal with it and avoid extinction is to find ways to increase live births and decrease the mortality rates. That is how science works. Immigration is how ideology works. There is nothing wrong with a small amount of immigration, but not the way it is being practiced whereby hundreds of foreigners are settled in small communities over Finland with little or no possibility of work are paid to live on welfare for extended periods. This leads to family and crime problems. We need at least 5% more births. Our problem is we have a bad ideology as a foundation of our society that has bad solutions. Even Darwinian theory will tell you that if the fittest survive, then we are not the fittest. We should let science deal with it if we believe science has all the answers. Otherwise we must turn to the creator, but turning to both is the answer. Don't destroy your next generation. Keep them and survive as a people.

      We must now face the truth, even in defiance of the UN sponsored gag law which is trying to stop it. "No religion condones the killing of innocent people." Every President and Prime Minister since 9/11 has made this misleading statement. In Islam, infidels are not innocent. So these presidents were in fact more right than they knew; the Quran states that infidels are fighting Allah. Therefore the violence we see all over the world against Christians is not against innocent people according to the Quran. What part of "kill infidels wherever you find them," which is a direct command from Muhammad, do politically correct left wing politicians not understand? It is not violence "pure and simple" as Prime Minister Blaire stated, but revenge taken against them.. In the final analysis it is what ISIS, Muslim Brotherhood and similar violent Islamic groups believe that count, and their source, absolutely verified by myself, is the Qur'an. If it is not so, I will shut down this site I have hosted for 16 years, that's how sure I am that we are in trouble because we have let down our guard and assisted the enemy in many cases. And we have kept the truth from the people. They believe in violence as a path to spread Islam, as did Muhammad. You need to know the real Islam. I believe if we, wherever you live, do the right thing and trust in God as our forefathers did, He will heal our family, leaders, and ultimately our country. If we decide to continue a charade of helping the enemy and permitting the loss of our human rights, freedom of speech, accept blindly these crazy ideas of the political elite and so forth, I can't see a bright future for any of us. That is how serious I believe this situation is.
      The Myth of Islamophobia (irrational fear) Factual news from the War Zone and Islam from CBN.

      I'd rather fight a physical enemy any day rather than a cloaked ideology. What do I mean by cloaked? A biological analogy might be in order. The aids virus is not recognized by our body's natural defenses so it gets to kill us. How is this applicable to any ideology? There is only one ideology that does this. Nazism and Communism both stated openly their world ambitions and how they are to be achieved, and so does Islam. Islam is an ideology. You don't agree? In England and France, what we see is an ideology being implanted. If it was Nazism or Communism, there would be no way it could happen, because we know enough about them to activate our resistance. Islam appears to the naked eye as a religion, due to the displays or overt behaviors of praying on the streets and the clothing. There would be little doubt that it is some kind of religion. We have been taught to respect all religions, and I am one who agrees with that custom. Here is where we go wrong. Just as the Titanic when it hit the visible part of an iceberg, we see what appears to be a peaceful enough Islam on our observations. But we cannot see what is below the water that they are trying to keep us from seeing, and even using the United Nations to do it. Kind of extreme reaction don't you think? To hide what? A lot. For example: sex with children, killing, beheading infidels, lying, raping etc. - all were done in the name of Islam by Muhammad and his army during their raids on infidels. ISIS is doing the same thing, so why are we complaining if we wish to accept all beliefs? We therefore are deceived into believing only what we see in individual Muslims and conclude it must be a peaceful religion. We see a lot of beheadings and violence, but they are explained away as not being of that religion, but violence "pure and simple." Finally, the big lie: no religion condones violence. Aha, but if it is an ideology, then it could! Islam is an ideology with a religious facade, or front. That is why we agree to defend it. Bad decision, based on bad information, propaganda and who knows who is being paid by oil money from Arab countries.

      Today we don't just defend this evil but persecute our own religion, which we have been deceived into believing is bad because it is not inclusive or some other silly reason. Islam is not only not inclusive but is a recipe for the destruction of all other religions, ideologies and cultures, in other words like scorched earth. People refuse to see the truth, and Islam will punish the West because we have abandoned God, and that is in process. Europe will fall first and their nukes will be in the hands of fanatics - unless we change our course now, immediately. We must not be afraid to be called whatever, and do the right thing. But we are afraid.

      ISIS is destroying Iraq's historical sites, just as other militants destroyed history in Afghanistan and elsewhere. Beware! Please follow some of my links and find out what lies under the waterline.

      If Muhammad is the source of violent Jihad, and he is, then what right have we to say Islam is peaceful? Generally speaking, our knowledge of Islam has been acquired like kids learn about sex on the street; most of it is myth and not much of it is factual. This site provides authoritative sources for correct information, and is not hate based. Truth is not hate. There is something rotten in Finland: the ruling elite are doing crazy things.
      How the Qur'an radicalizes Muslims - You would have to ban the Qur'an to stop the violence, so it will go on forever and only get worse and closer to home. What will you do when that happens and they come to give you the same option given to all infidels if they are not killed outright: convert or pay a large tax as a slave of Allah. It is like nothing we ever experienced before. What will you do, move to another country? Now you know why they don't want us to know - how can anyone change an evil ideology that has a religious front to protect it? Sorry if I burst your bubble but living a fantasy is dangerous. Get the facts.

      This is just to raise some red flags, to get you to take a closer look at something that can have serious consequences down the road. As far as I am concerned, the right to know trumps hate laws forbidding spreading any and all information whether false or correct about Islam. It is a Devine right, not to be trampled by man's laws. The government fears the truth, but we the people must have it and are allowed by God to have it. The Bible says "you shall know the truth and the truth will make (and keep) you free." If being free is important to you then you must be for free speech; no exceptions. Our freedom has been taken away gradually, so that we don't make a fuss. Our liberty has been taken away, and nobody is complaining. We have been dumbed down for this situation and that is where we are today. Universities have actually spearheaded freedom of speech only if you agree with us, under the threat of ruining your reputation. This must be reversed and the power of the people must be reinstated. Recall that the German people did not agree with Hitler, but they did not resist evil. We must resist evil. We are concerned about all kinds of inconsequential details rather than turning the ship around first before it goes on the rocks. The US debt is a perfect example. The is no possibility of paying off this debt unless there is a miracle. We are not working for the government, they are working for us, but they have beaten us into submission by making laws that constrain our behavior, and in the US they have thrown out the Constitution and doing as they please. That is tyranny as Thomas Jefferson stated: "When the people fear the government, you have tyranny, but when the government fears the people you have liberty." That's why Americans were encouraged to keep guns. The Swiss all have guns at home; it is their duty. Guns aren't the problem, people are. That is what I am saying here as well, namely that we need to go back to go forward. We need to be more like our grandfathers who valued freedom and loved their country enough to stand up to that monster to the east.

      Every corrupt government fears the truth and always has. They want to generate their own "facts." One such fact is that no religion kills innocent people. Have they never heard of human sacrifice in religion? Or the 900 or so Jews that were beheaded by Muhammad after he tricked them into surrendering? We wouldn't want to go against the UN would we? Yes we would! UN Resolution 1618 passed by 56 Muslim countries, the largest voting block, is for the purpose of silencing criticism of Islam. This is an admission that there is something important to hide. Would you like to know what it is? Let's look at what this forbidden fruit is. They are using the UN to further their plans of world domination and especially the destruction of Israel, the only thriving and prosperous democracy in the region. That is not what the UN was set up for, but that is what it has become: furthering special interests. This just raises red flags, that there must be something sinister there that they don't want us to know! I found this to be accurate. Preventing you from knowing the plans Muhammad had left for his followers is to be forbidden by law and fines over €1000 are common. This is just plain suicide if we go along with their Resolution. We are very foolish to cut off information from the people of our own free will and by law. This page is to counter it, to let you know what you need to know, that there is tremendous opposition in the UN to prevent. We must learn from history not our own mistakes. History tells us that immigration precedes takeover. It has always been that way, and we see the proof in Ukraine right now where Russian immigrants are seizing territory. In England and France, Muslims have seized territory and non-Muslims and police have no business going there. The Finnish people of the north a thousand years ago welcomed Slavic people into the north to live peacefully amongst them. In a few years they realized their mistake, and lost control of their land to the invaders. We love all "races" and allow people to freely worship even stones if they wish. But having said that, it does not mean that these things will make the lives of Finns better if we permit people who will never integrate to live in our communities in uncontrolled numbers. It did the opposite in Britain and France, and they regret what they have allowed.

      The quality of life in any country depends on stability of everything: money, laws, expectations of the future, morality etc. but right now everything is in flux. Nothing can be trusted. This has a negative effect on the economy. When we got off the gold standard, purchasing power began to decline yearly, and today it is still going down. When we no longer had a fixed morality, meaning nothing is bad, we can determine right or wrong each their own way, we no longer had a solid underpinning for society. It began to unravel, just as our purchasing power did. Today we have ideology ruling over common sense. Taken together, all these uncertainties mean our quality of life is slipping. To correct this situation and return to the road to prosperity and a healthy society, we need fixed values and currency pinned to the price of gold, and a morality pinned to the tenants of the Bible, not the Quran. We seem to think any set of values is OK. This must be reversed. When we do all these things, then we will be on the road to a bright future. Omitted, and we continue the inflation and destruction of our culture and people. This is applicable to the world as a whole. Islam is a force for destabilization wherever it appears. Nobody knows what the tenants of this ideology are. We are prevented from knowing by the media that is supposed to keep us informed. Our information is filtered, and uncertainty builds. We hear of all the war or rebellion connected with wherever there is Islam, whether in Europe or the Middle East, yet we have no idea what is the root cause. This is uncertainty and it is bad for the economy and society as a whole.

      Only one Islam exists; there has never been the extremist and peaceful Islam. You either practice Islam fully or you don't as in any religion, and that is what we see, mind you with variations in intensity. There is a frightening similarity between Nazism and Islam (e.g. extermination of Jews and infidels; dictatorship) and we are witnessing its expression in ISIS. If you don't agree, read up on the life of Muhammad. Have you done that? If not, you have no right to disagree.

      Free eBook: Islam: Religion of Peace or War

      Their strategy as stated in their manifesto is brilliant: make opposition impossible with hate laws. The very essence of Christian beliefs of truth is opposite of Islam, as Allah is, according to the Koran, the greatest deceiver of them all - a liar. Check it it out for yourself. The roots of terrorism are in the Quran, not in fake excuses for it. We, and every Muslim must understand that Islam is the problem, yet if you say it in Finland you will be arrested. When political correctness trumps truth, that society is in trouble. What is this rumor going around that terror and cutting off heads is not a part of Islam? It is just a rumor, but we can easily find the truth if we want it. The rampant naivety regarding the dangers in Islam is scary. Call it Islamophobia if you want, but if you understood the world conquest asperations of Islam, you would be frightened too, not of Islam but of the lack of knowledge on our part that is playing straight into their hands. We are basically in denial about the real Islam, giving it an opportunity to advance their world wide cause without opposition. To put it bluntly, we are being stupid.

      Surah 8:12 Examined:
      "Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): "I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instil terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them." Need more?

      Obama believes Islam is a peaceful religion

      Uralic People

      The Uralic Family of languages is comprised of two branches: 1) Finno-Ugric, and 2) Samoyedic. The Baltic Finnish/Karelian and Estonian (Finnic), Hungarian (Ugric) and Saami ("saw-me") people belong to this distinct group of linguistically related people. Uralic people are by definition indigenous people of the northern regions between the Urals and Norway. Finns are not some people who just wandered into Finland a thousand years ago from somewhere around Mongolia, as some historians want us to believe. Of course there have been waves of migration from the South and East over millennia. Finns are just as indigenous as Saami ("Lapps"). Ancient Finno-Ugric people even hunted in Central Europe at least during periods of glaciation. If this is the case, assimilation of these northern tribes has been going on for over ten thousand years. The process has been so gradual that their language has been preserved though genetically Finns are to a great extent European. These are fundamentally shy people, who have started to break out. Eastern Finns, the Karelians, my ancestry, are more fun-loving in the sense that they are a little less inhibited socially. Many of their homes are in wilderness all the way east to Lake Onega and North to the White Sea. The people have borne the brunt of Russian attacks through the ages and have become very good woodsmen, especially highly skilled in hunting and fishing, and familiarity with the terrain. The Finno-Ugric language in Europe has died out thousands of years ago, and thus there are no pockets of the language south of Norway and Sweden. The evidence for their European domicile during the last glaciation comes from Mitochondrial DNA.

      The Finns are indeed indigenous people not only of Northern Europe but vast areas from central Europe to the Ob river in the east. This is the story of a people who have adapted to a difficult life in the north, with periods of plenty punctuated by periods of famine and hardships. The result is a noble, gracious, tenacious people with a desire to be forever free, not bowing down to anyone and building a culture from a rich heritage of mythology, skilled craftsmanship, heroic actions against invaders - finally resulting in nationhood. Finns are stubbornly independent and cannot be subjugated. The Czars knew that and left them alone, not totally swallowing them into mother Russia when Sweden (1150-1809) lost control of Finland to Russian forces in 1809. They became a valued associate, called a Grand Duchy, rather than a slave.

      Crazy ideas about the origin of Finns have existed for hundreds of years. Some believe that until a thousand years ago, Finland was occupied only by Saami and that Finns migrated from the east and settled there, even as late as the first millennium. This theory has been disproven and now we know that ancestors of Finns have been there and also over a large area much longer, as the agreement between DNA, archeology and linguistic theory has shown. Two Theories Their traditional lands include everything between Lake Onega and Norway. The Russian government begs to differ; they want their people to believe this all was old Russian lands, justifying their annexation. Two criminals, Hitler and Stalin started WWII, dividing Europe between themselves. Both were hoping to acquire long coveted lands for their own expansion. Both had visions of controlling the world: one with Communism, the other Fascism. Unfortunately, like common criminals, one turned on the other, and the rest is history. After the war, Stalin got to share in dividing Europe, and Karelia became a victim, as did Poland and the Baltic States along with all of Eastern Europe. United States and Britain turned over to Stalin's executioners all Soviet citizens residing in the west, who had hoped to escape that beast. Finland too was obliged to turn over its prisoners. All people turned over to Stalin after the war had the same fate: execution or prison camps in Siberia, which amounted to the same thing.

      My parents had to leave Viipuri on November 30, 1939 like over 500,000 other Karelians in the path of the advancing Russians. My 17 year old mother was fortunate in catching a train out of the city with her family, transferring to a narrow gauge railway and finally arriving in Lahti. My father was still single and had joined the army in June of that year and fought in the Winter War.



      At this time Russia was a Fascist country, since they started the war with Germany. Finland had made peace with Russia in 1940 after destroying much of the Russian army but in the end losing Karelia. When Germany attacked Russia and Finland was forced to fight again, now the Russians called Finland Fascist, and justified annexation as liberation from Fascism. How else could they justify theft, than falsifying truth. Finland never was a Fascist nation, though it did cooperate with Hitler in fighting Russia, to try and take back Karelia. Finland did take it back until 1944 when Russia took it back again with all the American and Canadian weapons. My father found Heinz ketchup and other American food in the Russians backpacks.

      Russian people took over most of the eastern province of Karelia in 1944, thanks to Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin, who divided Europe amongst themselves, forgetting all about why they joined the war in the first place: to guarantee the sovereignty of Poland. Britain declared war on Germany, although the Soviets were also in on the attack on Poland; we must remember this because Stalin was to get away with "murder" throughout the war, then demanded land for taking the brunt of Hitler's army. They quickly forgot all about this when Stalin joined forces to beat Hitler, allowing Stalin a free hand with his neighbors. America and Britain, however, did not annex anything like the Soviets. Of course they must return these lands to their owners if they are to comply with agreements that were signed, we know that, but they don't want to know. Many Finns today believe that Karelia, the 1/10 of Finland that was annexed, must be returned, but how to achieve that has been an problematic, and most politicians, except for a few descendants of Karelians, rather stay away from the subject. While they want Karelia returned, Finns want to be in good terms with Russians, showing that they are extremely patient. Today Russians are doing everything they can to justify their claim of "liberating" Karelia from "Fascism" including fabricating information. It has been suggested that Finns deserve what they got for cooperating with Hitler. While Finns cooperated with Hitler for a time, so did Stalin - which cancels out this argument. While Finns did it out of selfish reasons, to save their country, so did the Russians, to try and divide Europe with Hitler, a task in which they succeeded. However, the deception of the "Fascist" Finns is still alive and well. The Finns are in origin Finno-Ugric, not Germanic, so they cannot join in Hitler's plan for racial purity, nor do they have any interest in killing Jews or anyone else including Russians for Hitler's conquest. To be a Fascist country, Finland would need a dictator and of course there was none, because Finland was a free democratic country wishing only to protect itself from the neighbor, who had expansionist ambitions.

      Still today, the Soviet view permeates the world's history books about how Finland joined Hitler and how bad Finland was in resisting Stalin's expansion into Finland. This is absurd. Every Finn knows that Finland was succeeding in defending itself and this made the allies angry not because it was right or wrong, but because Stalin was their ally, which clouded their vision. The new residents of Karelia, Great Russians, have regular meetings to celebrate the theft (liberation) of Karelia from the "Fascist" Finns. The propaganda of the Soviet era is alive and well in Russia in the second millennium. This celebration of victory is done with the theme "the Fascist Finns must pay." That is the only justification for annexing Karelia the Russians can come up with. The guilt by association does not work in this case, as the Finns were attacked first and only wanted back what is theirs. Apparently Churchill did not like that and demanded Finland cease fighting in 1944. Finland did not capitulate but signed a treaty to end the war anyway, as Stalin was in a hurry to get to Berlin ahead of Americans.


      Finns are indigenous to Finland - it is their country that they have defended for over a thousand years. The term "indigenous" has come to mean a minority group within a larger group, but this may not be accurate in some cases. If that group should grow in numbers (due to agriculture for example) compared to another group, or mixing with Swedes, could it cease to be "indigenous", like the Finns for example? Some people believe that because they aren't living in tents. Who should we include as indigenous, and should we redefine the term? Is the term politicized to exclude certain groups because of statistical numbers, skin color or culture? Here is one definition of the term: "Indigenous peoples are people, communities, and nations who claim a historical continuity and cultural affinity with societies endemic to their original territories that developed prior to exposure to the larger connected civilization associated with Western culture." This definition is in relation to "Western Culture." When some people claim that Finns are fairly recent settlers, (around 1000 ce) they mean that Finns are not indigenous. Obviously this definition does not fit every situation either. If everyone came from somewhere at some time, when do we call someone "indigenous?" How long must they reside in the area? The Jews immigrated to Canaan "Israel" at the time of Abraham, around 2000 BC. It was given to Abraham and his tribe by God at that time. It was not given to his half brother, Ishmael, who was banished into the desert, and became associated with Arab nations. Israel was the little corner of the globe that belonged to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. This included Jerusalem. Arabs beg to differ, but on what basis? We ask these questions to start the process of considering the subject of who is entitled morally to occupy and benefit from any piece of land on the earth. Should the basis for land ownership be based on ancestral, indigenous rights? Does anyone have the right to take it away and must it be returned? If Israel has to give up land, so does Russia?

      Based on these facts, are Jews indigenous to Israel? Which group has rightful claim to Israel because they are indigenous? Are Arabs entitled to claim all the land in the area, and if so on what grounds? These are questions that need to be answered if the issue of land entitlement is to be solved. Americans, Canadians, Australians and Russians will have a hard time defending any position regarding who owns "stolen" land; they walked into other people's land and killed as many as they could, at took the land. If the Jews and Arabs are joined together by a mutual ancestor, why do they fight each other for land? What has this got to do with Finns? Finns have been fighting over land that belongs to them as well, and we believe we are entitled to all of Karelia, St. Petersburg area all the way to Lake Onega. That is our ancestral land. Finns will never stop trying to get it back one way or another. Perhaps this government doesn't want to touch the subject, but one day these liberal rulers will be history and another more patriotic leader will emerge and the subject will be reborn as it was in 1941. Patriotic Finnish rulers have become extinct, but we are still hoping. Independence is no longer a priority. We are hoping that if it is right for Palestinians to get "their" land back so they can work toward destroying Israel properly, then why not the Karelians who had their land taken twice: 1939 and 1944? This includes the Poles, Japanese, and anyone else that lost land to the Soviets by 1945.

      Although Saami consider themselves distinct from the majority culture, in fact the Finns and Saami have coexisted in and around present Finland since the last glaciation, although agriculture and the resulting fences have pushed Saami ever further north. Of course the majority Finnish population has seen genetic drift from neighbors but so have the Saami. So, we can consider the Finnish majority as not only indigenous to Finland but to Europe as well. Like Finns, the Saami are indigenous to large territories of Northern Europe and today's Northwestern Russia, both having inhabited the area ever since the last ice age, ending approximately 11,000 years ago, but perhaps already long before that as well as recent archeology has shown.

      The Canadian Indians are called "First Nations" so perhaps who got there first can claim the territory on historical grounds. Reclaiming it though can be difficult or impossible, but it can be done. Imagine if the UN approved the return of much of Russia to their former owners. The Eastern Slavs would have few places to go. We believe that some of the land taken and its resources should be restored to the owners so that these people (displaced Baltic Finns in Ingria, Karelia and Eastward to the bend in the Volga), can move forward in prosperity and culturally like the Slavic majority and perhaps even further. The only people that should be granted separate treatment within a nation are indigenous people.

      If Russia began a process of firstly listening to the grievances of these people, they would certainly receive a positive review from the international community. But what if the native Indians of North America were not the first to arrive? Could we still call them "First Nations?" It seems that Finns or someone closely related to them, may have arrived first. This confirms my own theory that Finns traveled in an East-West direction, following fish and game, during the last glaciation, even ending up in America. When the ancestors of present day Indians arrived in North America, these Europeans disappeared. Were they killed off, or absorbed, or a little of both? The native Americans are preventing proper analysis of archeology finds claiming all bones older than 5000 years as their dead ancestors. But the scientists protested that these skeletons were not their relatives.

      Kvenland
      The Russian government's position is that they are just as entitled to the land as the Finns, but actually they are squatters on Finnish land rather than the other way around. Russians claim the land on historical grounds, but their history goes back hundreds, while the Finno-Ugric history goes back thousands of years. That is why Russian historians don't want to recognize that Finns have lived in Finland and Karelia for thousands of years, preferring the theory that they arrived there at the same time as themselves, sometime around the 12th-13th Century. International precedents have been set, as in Canada, whereby it is acknowledged that indigenous people are entitled to their land and the resources on it, that they can develop and benefit from as they see fit. Russian governments in the past have simply raped the resources and left the people with nothing but a destroyed environment, while practicing genocide on the people. The goal was since around 1000 AD to reduce the indigenous population and increase the Russian, while confiscating their trading posts at various rivers throughout the North. In more recent times, in the last several hundred years, this was done by killing them or banishing the people to distant places and leaving them there to fend for themselves, sometimes in the middle of winter. Stalin practiced genocide on a grand scale, but also banishing people to distant camps only to die of hunger and over work. The ">
      Nuclear testing in northern Russia has spread radioactive debris all through the north, and much of it has reached Finland and the rest of Scandinavia as well. The result has been a lot of birth defects. Canadians (the author's present domicile) are beginning to become more civilized with respect to the native population, at least on paper, but the follow-through has been slow and often default has been the outcome. However, on APTN, the native TV channel in Canada, we can see that the people have made great strides in many areas including restoring their native languages. This must happen in Russia too to the Finno-Ugric languages.

      It has been suggested that Finns are not European, but Asian. Anyone who watches hockey on TV will not agree. Finns have a distinct European, "Nordic" stamp, but with genetic links to the original people dating back to the Ice Ages. The writer's own theory of Finno-Ugric occupation of the North has solid research backing which opens the door to even greater possibilities in the quest for ancient origins of Finns. Certainly the Finnish population will have certain inclusions of Asian genetic influence - it would not be rational to conclude otherwise. The Huns occupied much of Europe at one time too, so Finland is not the only country to have eastern influence. However, to place the Finns as "Asians" or "Mongolians" (as some, such as H.G. Wells, like to do) has no basis in present scientific evidence. Mongolian influence, or genetic drift, has been active westward for millennia, all over Europe and Russia. H.G. Wells writes in his book "The Outline of History" that "To the Northwest the Finns, a Mongolian people, had long been established as far west as the Baltic." He probably never even met a Finn. This incorrect view has been propagated by earlier writers and repeated by many other historians. Some even placed the Finns incorrectly in the Ugric branch. There is no way that northern people of the world can not have any eastern elements, since genes flowed east and west along the ancient ice melt, but to say they are a "Mongolian people" is incorrect. New evidence under the North Sea

      Certain physical and Mitochondrial characteristics attributed to Finns and Saami (formerly called Lapps) were probably already present in the aboriginal Europeans, which we now believe included the Finns and Saami. (Origins of Saami in left column)

      Why did the prehistoric Finns have to travel, and how did they do it? The estimated resource area per person is between 0.1 - 0.5 sq. km. to survive in the north, and this meant travel in the vast Boreal Forests. Boat People Theory To traverse the huge numbers of lakes in the north during the long winters, early Finns invented ice skates. Later, when agriculture reached Finland, famines were fairly common as crops failed. The latest big one was in the latter half of the 17th Century, when Europe's weather took a deadly turn for the worse. In Finland, families even gave their children to the nomadic Saami to save them from starvation. Many ended up all the way up to the coast of Norway, as these nomads followed the migratory routes of their reindeer to the higher summer pastures in the mountains. Unlike the caribou of the Northwest Territories, that migrated from the treeline to the Barren Grounds in Canada, the migratory paths of these reindeer was east-west. The Saami were taxed by the Finns, but they also benefited from Finns. The Finns got furs and in return, the Saami got steel items that sometimes were traded all the way from the Middle East via the Volga River to Bjarmland.

      There are many related groups in the former Soviet Union, most of which are quickly being assimilated into the dominant Russian language and culture. This has lately begun to be reversed, but it is a gigantic task. Just as the western Finns have had Germanic influence, the eastern Finnish cultures have developed with many Turkic/Indo-Iranian and Slavic cultural, religious and linguistic influences. The eastern Finnish languages cannot be understood by Finns today as contacts to the east have been more or less cut for eight hundred years of Russian history. At times, glaciers also separated the Eastern Finno-Ugric people from their relatives that once extended from the Netherlands to the shores of the Black Sea in the South. So of course Finns would have some "Eastern" genes since their hunting and trading range to the East may have reached Siberia.

      Place-names which stretch all the way to the Ural mountains are ancient Finnish related in origin which can be seen in the map section. Many place names have similar prefixes although they might be several thousand kilometers apart. Finno-Ugric place names based on the root "sum" and "sam" testify to the large area Finns once called their land. "Suursuomi" movement or the idea of rebuilding a larger Finland that Slavs conquered, gained strength in 1941 when the Finns set out to take back land Russia annexed the year before. Stalin had grossly underestimated Finnish ingenuity, determination and stamina.

      Many Finns and Estonians have a keen interest in their relatives to the east with whom many still feel some kinship ties. Recently, due to events in Russia against Finno-Ugric people by Moscow, there has been increased interest in this topic from many countries.

      Finnish culture is very Scandinavian in style, but Finno-Ugric origins make the people distinct in many ways.

      Who are the Uralic people? Where did they come from? Where do they live? What is their language and culture like? This web page explores these and many other questions relating to Uralic people: their past, present and future. We cannot do anything about the past, and the present is now, but we have the power to affect the future of the Finno-Ugric people, and the Finnish people are no exception.


      Finland and the Finnish People

      One cannot understand Finnish language, history and culture without some knowledge of related people. Finnish history and culture are presented against a background of the other Finno-Ugric people, the original Europeans(Fin.) Finnish written history is only from the second millennium, but fortunately the Finns have a strong oral tradition going back to the ice ages. Finns, and Karelian tribes in particular, had a strong oral tradition of rune singing their history of their ancient shamanistic beliefs, myth, magic, love and war. These traditions survived in Karelia probably because of the relative isolation from the early Finnish church. These stories were collected in the 19th Century and compiled into one story, composed of a masterful collection of epic poems that reveal the daily life of the people over millennia. Karelia, the land of the writer's ancestors, has a long history going back over eight thousand years. Today, Finns love their Kalevala which is read and enjoyed as a rich historical and mythological legacy of their ancestors. One reason for this is that Finns know that they have a glorious past that has been buried by official versions of history propagated during the time Finland was a part of Sweden and continued today in schools. The true oral tradition of the Finns survived in the backwoods of Karelia. We view the whole history of the Finnish people as open to revision by scientific multidisciplinary investigation.

      As for the reliability of the information contained here, of course there may be some outdated material as some sources are very old. One of the greatest values in historical study is that the further back we look, the further forward we are able to see. The more cultures and religions we understand, the better we can manage our own cultures and religions, or what we believe to be true. Too little knowledge about important subjects is a dangerous thing, and here I try to open up your desire to know more about certain subjects that are timely and urgent so you can decide for yourself, while at the same time giving my own honest opinion. At the same time, we hope to discard some of the old assumptions we cling to passionately, which may be false.

      The Finnish tribes ruled the North since the last Ice Age. A thousand years ago, Eastern Slavs began intercepting Karelian trade with the Norwegians and Volga traders. The map section shows the areas they used in their wilderness trips. When the population exploding slavs came and took over the key trading posts to the East, they forced the inhabitants to move West. Timing is everything; the Slavs were two hundred years too late. By the time Slavs arrived, the Perm ivory trade was in decline as new sources became available in Africa. Trading posts in the Northwest Finno-Ugrian Nation that were established by Finns were reestablished by Russians (e.g. Ustjug). Most of them were taken from their original owners by force after they made several friendly visits. Finns joined the Swedish Army to prevent Russians from occupying all of Finnish lands. Though the Russian Chronicles state that they were fighting Swedes, the truth is that they were fighting Finns trying to keep what is theirs: their lands. You see Swedes never tried to turn Finns into Swedes, but Russians have been Russifying Finns from the time they entered their lands back in the 11th Century. It was providential that the Western Finns were "protected" by Sweden for 700 years, which gave this nation the opportunity to become what it is today rather than suffer genocide and absorption - which was the intention of mother Russia. Both Sweden and Russia fought for control of the land between Lake Onega and the Baltic, but the real owners of this land are Baltic Finns themselves, mainly Tavastians, Karelians (Eastern and Western), Veps, (Southeastern Karelians) and Ingrians who live between Estonia and Karelia.


      Since the last war, misinformation flooded the world's knowledge base and many false teachings have been spread about the Finns, Karelians, their rightful heritage in the north. These must be set straight. Viipuri (Vyborg) for example, which is not far from St. Petersburg, on the Gulf of Finland, was established by Finns and built by Finns - not Russians. Russian pamphlets and a plaque on a wall near the Viipuri fortress state that the natural harbor city of Viipuri is an old Russian city (when Finland was for a time a Russian Grand Duchy with an autonomous government, and for a time long ago when Finnish Viipuri was part of the Novgorod trade group where Finnish goods were traded with the Slavs to the east, before Russia even existed). It was part of a trading block, similar to the German Hanseatic League and now it is "back with the rightful owners." Finland "belonged" to Sweden a lot longer than it did Russia, including Viipuri, in fact about 700 years. The fact is that Viipuri and indeed all of Karelia (to the shores of Onega), Ingria (the area where St. Petersburg is today) and Finland belong to the Finnish people. Finns were deported from these areas when the Russians moved west to the Baltic, especially during and after Peter the Great established St. Petersburg in 1703. After the WWII, Russia settled newly occupied areas of Karelia vacated by Finns, who were escaping Marxism and Stalin, with people from all over Russia. Gradually all buildings suffered neglect and Karelia began to look like rundown Russian town. A Finnish site has documented all the lies told to the Russian people about the Second World War. As always, the Finns are the "Fascist" aggressors.

      Many countries have claims against Russia, land that has been taken when the opportunity presented during WWII. Who took the land? The Allies, specifically Russia. Karelia was taken by force in 1944 and it should be returned by the Allies (Britain, US, and Canada) since Russia could not have done it without American and Canadian material aid. When Russia blames Finland, it usually points to Finland's association with Germany and that Russia was fighting Fascism. However, if Russians are honest with themselves they will admit that they too were allied with Russia and they are the ones who started WWII with Germany. Having started WWII, Russia then blames Finland for attacking first. How absurd can you get.

      Karelia falls into Russian hands at the end of WWII

      The history of Finns in Karelia goes back to the ice age, when Slavs were still down in the warm south. I believe that this land was given to the Finns and they should have control over it. The Slavs are occupying it at the moment, but who knows what the future will bring. The writer's father always believed that he would have his home back, which was taken by Russians in 1944, along with the demand for over $500 Million dollars worth of war indemnity. The Russians undervalued everything so the number is much higher. To the Russian's surprise the Finns paid it off in a few years and became a manufacturing powerhouse. There was a clause that Russians would get more land if the Finns defaulted. Apparently they still had not learned their lesson: they weren't dealing with an ordinary people here. These were Finns.

      Shouldn't everyone get their land back? Of course the Slavs would have nowhere to go then. We Finns did not sell our land, it was taken by force. As far as the owners are concerned, they still own it and it is under occupation, as is the land in United States by this definition. That land was taken, not once but twice between 1939 and 1944.

      Is there a comparison between Finns and Jews? In some ways. The brilliant Israeli scientists made the desert bloom, and now the ones who sold them land want it back! Then, when attacked by neighbors, they expanded. Only Jews have to leave land they have purchased or settled because it is called "occupation." The area has been the home of Jews for thousands of years, and there is no reason to believe they do not belong there, like the Finns belong in their ancestral lands. Like the Israelis, the Finns almost always end up victorious against their main enemy through history - Russia. They are both blessed with knowledge of warfare tactics that offset the uneven numbers. Traditionally Russians just took and killed everyone or sent them off to Siberia as slaves - then Russifies the population. This is genocide. They also turned the Eastern Finns to the Orthodox Religion, to drive them away from their brothers and into the Russian fold. It seemed to work. Russians want desperately to join the world economic system, or they cannot move forward. First they should make good and give back the land, not just to the Finns but all the small defenseless countries they preyed upon especially at a time when everyone was in crisis. To justify these annexations, the Russians now resort to changing history, or omitting it altogether. Russia's land grabs. The Arabs never forgive the Israelis, and they never really move forward either. Finns know how to forgive the Russians, and therefore they have moved forward and became one of the most prosperous countries in the world. The Bible teaches forgiveness; the Koran teaches the opposite as we have seen with the various Muhammad artists and the resulting killings and riots. We have here two polar opposite philosophies trying to coexist. Then Russians must restore their integrity and trust, which takes a long time to establish. After that, they must prove themselves trustworthy.

       

    You will also find famous Finnish products, CD's, Videos, books and other links provided for your convenience and enjoyment at the Uralic City Center. Check out Pirkko Kiansten's Internet radio show Saturday mornings 9:30 - 11:00 AM Pacific time. Uralica is happy to offer some of Pirkko's finest shows from archived files, over 50 hours to date. If you are interested in listening to Finnish/Karelian language radio stations around the world, you will find a link to some programs from Russian Karelia to the Pacific shores of Canada.

    Listen to Finnish music now Finnish music has reached a peak in the last 50 years. The quality and quantity of music ranging from classical to chamber choir music has no rivals in the world today, even from larger countries. .If you are interested in war history, may I recommend Antti's exclusive WW2 Continuation War Photo Gallery. There are dozens of photos taken in 1941-42 on Lake Laatokka (Ladoga), scanned from our family album. Some of the material you will find very controversial, but I have stated everything truthfully to the best of my knowledge and experience. I hope you enjoy your stay and that you will come back often to see what's new. Please bookmark it now for future reference.
    The Return of Karelia

    Finland was attacked by Soviet Union, without cause November 30, 1939. Karelians are waiting for their land to be returned. A new book (2012) in Finland says that the Finns are in the process of bringing the question of Finland's guilt or innocence in the accusation that Finland is responsible for the war with Soviet Union, to the highest court in Finland, which still clings to the Soviet imposed line that the government was committing a crime in fighting the Soviets. What is meant by that is, that Finland should have just laid down their weapons and let the Soviets occupy Finland. This is absurd, but that is the logical scenario if Finland should do what those backing the Soviet view, says they should have. The men "responsible" were imprisoned: Risto Ryti and his ministers. Most Finns want this corrected, and the government is not willing to go there.

    Karelia should never have been taken in the first place - it was Stalin's doing - and we know how bad he was to even his own people. The Americans and British caved in to Stalin's desires for expansion at the expense of Finland. There is quite a large organized movement in Finland to repatriate Karelia back to its rightful owners. The only thing that those in Russia who want to keep this booty have to defend their ill gotten gains is that they were "liberating" Karelia from "Fascists." Even a school boy knows that Hitler and Mussolini were Fascists, but not Finland. May I remind anyone who wants to take the Russian point of view, that Russia fought along side of Hitler, and together they started WWII. So, those Russians pointing at Finland, better point at themselves. Furthermore, Russia signed the (Atlantic Charter, 1942) which means they promised not to engage in land grabbing in exchange for foreign aid. Now that Karelia is occupied by Russia, Putin has embarked upon a restructuring of historical facts to consolidate these gains as legitimate.


    In researching sources such as the Encyclopaedia Britannica be aware that it may contain Soviet era disinformation regarding areas they "liberated." The elite have always had their way, employing writers to write or invent history. They are very clever at it, and you can easily miss the lie or omission if you don't have enough background information to spot it. For example, when Finland was attacked by Russia, fancy weapons were scarce, so they invented the Molotov Cocktail, a solution of flammable liquid that destroyed tanks. Now they are claiming it was


    Finland and The Finnish People

      Finland (Suomi), a northern European country of 5.3 million people, is a land where peasants have always been free. Historically, Finns are stubbornly independent and hard-working.

      Since 1155, Finland had been in the Swedish realm. Finland, became the borderline between the Orthodox east and Western Christianity. I'd like to put religion into perspective here. Most Finns are Lutheran Christians. Simply put, the Bible is the highest authority, and the worship of Mary, icons, saints and special intercession and interpretive powers for priests was discarded by Martin Luther, and rejected by Jesus. According to Him, the priest's duties were transferred to all people.





      In 1808, Finland became a Russian autonomous Grand Duchy, a special status giving the Finns great control of their internal government. After the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917, Finland became an independent republic with a social democratic government. The Finnish Independence Day is December 6.

       

      At 337,000 sq. km. (130,128.01 sq. mi.), with 60,000 lakes, Finland is about the size of New England, New Jersey, and New York combined, or 4/10 the size of British Columbia, Canada. Finland's southern shores are at the approximate latitude of Yukon/Northwest Territories/British Columbia border. Finland can boast a little bit when confronted with one-up-manship of neighbors. Finland's education system is rated (2002, 2003) third best in the world, and in 2006 ranked the highest.

        Finland's Education System Tops
        Rated number one in the world makes Finns among the smartest people in the earth, way ahead of the Swedes. We shall see if the Finns use their intelligence to save themselves from "excessive immigration" of Muslims that are causing trouble in other European countries. Finland ranked number one on the UN's 2003 technology achievement index. Forbes, 2004
        Freedom of Press: which country is tops? You guessed it. These values and identity that built and sustained Finland should be preserved.

        Finland, Cultural Lone Wolf   Living in Finland

    Sixty Minutes TV show reported that Finns are the shyest people on earth. I know this to be accurate to some extent having been born there, but they are making good progress.

    I took a trip to the country where I was born before going to University, as a sort of "Rite of Passage." There I met the Finns themselves, my people, who were not that shy once you got to know them. Shyness is a national character and does not necessarily mean they are depressed or antisocial. You must realize that Finns are originally a forest/river/lake people and as such are comfortable being alone in the vast wilderness of the north; living with crowds is alien to the Finnish spirit - the exception being (e.g. Tango) dance halls.


    European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE) is addressing the needs of people who were displaced in wartime. Central issue is the return of assets taken, especially real estate. Russians for some reason have always thought that Karelia was theirs, and Sweden had no rights there. How is it that they should have the right to take the land away from the Finns, then force the Finns to pay for their campaign of terror after they took Karelia, the best part of Finland along with a large lake Finland shared with Russia? In the final analysis it amounts to ">
    Did the Finnish tribes change the Russian place names to Finnish, or did the invading Russians change the Finnish names to Russian? Who named the geographical areas are the owners. Check the map section and see how far East from the present border the Finnish names for every stream, lake, and other topography, went. You see, the argument between the Finns and Russians was over land. The Swedes backed the Finns and the Russians tried divide and conquer to get the Eastern Finnic people to fight their relatives to the West.Their goal was to reach the Baltic, which was already occupied by Finns, Estonians, Livonians, Latvians and Lithuanians. The Swedes did not turn the Finns into Swedes over the 700 years they controlled the territory, but the Russians did everything they could to prevent the Eastern Karelians from joining their brothers to the West. Religion played a big role there. Russia's genocide and annexation continued up to 1944.

    It will be interesting to see how willing Putin et al is in returning booty USSR took illegally. (Russia signed the Atlantic Charter meaning no country was to grab land) Since Karelia was a part of USSR which no longer exists, Russia has actually annexed Karelia after the fall of Communism. Karelia should have gone back to Finland at that time.


    Finland (like many other European States, e.g. Poland and Baltic States) failed to obtain assistance from United States and Britain in the WWII. The "Third Aggressor of WWII" received assistance "to beat Hitler" but this aid was used to annex millions of square Kilometers of land to the Soviet Union.



    It may sound silly but, nowadays Russia still actually claims that tiny Finland attacked the giant Soviet Union and that they were fighting Fascism. Even Churchill pointed to Finland's "Fascist" leanings, though all Finland wanted was Karelia back where it belongs. Perhaps by the same logic, England had Communist leanings since they were friends of Stalin. A mouse does not normally attack an elephant, but that Finnish mouse did roar when attacked. Finland was never, and never will be Fascist - it is against the Finnish nature which accepts everyone, while one of the main goals of Fascism is to cull away all undesirables of the face of the earth. Finland was, in fact, fighting its age-old war: trying to prevent Russians from annexing/occupying/absorbing, Russifying and finally enslaving the people.
    From the Baltic to the Pacific, the land is claimed by "Russians" as theirs since time began, but in reality, they conquered the peaceful tribes and put them under their harsh yoke. Yet, they claim old Finnish cities such as Viipuri as "Old Russian" city they liberated from the Finnish thieves. Russian history books are great fiction, but when repeated in the West, their "history" becomes a serious thing the Finns have been trying to correct.

    Accusing the other side of aggression is merely a normal war formality. The Finns did not have a death wish. The old sport of "the Russians crossing the Finnish Line" (where they often got Finnished) goes back hundreds of years, but Churchill and Roosevelt chose to ignore that fact in 1941-44, an about face from 1939, when Russia tried to annex little Finland. That the war was not just is refuted or accepted by Russian leadership depending on who is in power. The present administration claims Finland attacked, which was the Soviet position. Russia downplays the first 1939-40 Winter War (which is easily seen as Russian aggression) but emphasizes Finland's 1941 offensive to take back the lost territory with German aid. Hence Soviets claim that the land they took in 1944 was liberated from the fascists, (therefore morally right) though Finland is and has always been, a Social Democratic country - and fiercely independent. The counter culture of 1970's called stealing "liberating" - which is what the Russians still call it today. The indigity done not just to the Finns, but the other Baltic countries as well, by the Soviets - and picked up by and repeated by the Western press - is that anyone fighting with the Nazis against Soviets, were Nazis themselves. This lie cast a shadow over the Finns and helped the Soviets annex Karelia in front of the noses of Churchill and Roosevelt, and with their blessings. Both nations abstained from recognizing Finnish independence in 1918, and here they again approved Finland's reunion with Russia. They hoped that by giving Stalin what he wanted, he would cooperate with them later. But fighting with the Nazis, or being occupied by them was of little consequence, for the results would be the same: annexation, enslavement and forced deportation and/or death. The use of the word "Nazi" by the Russian people, even today often extends to anyone opposed to Russian influence. Russian propaganda only focuses on the millions of people the Nazis murdered, but seldom do they recall for the people the millions of people Stalin, one of their own, murdered.



    The world has a right to be concerned today about the direction Russia is headed under Putin et al. The minute Putin became the leader of Russia, I warned that he is big trouble. I was right. Russia has become a corrupt tyranny of the majority, with much Nazi-like behavior like German brown shirts of the 30's, and even the news is under government control. Putin stages rallies to stay in power and in 2014 he made his move to rebuild the Soviet Union according to his evil, corrupt mind. Perhaps there is more Fascism and Communism still in the world than we would like to admit, both sides of the Atlantic. Which one is worse is anyone's guess as both want total control over the people's wishes. Putin is still in charge and he is corrupt, and now he wants Tao rebuild the Soviet Union.



    Putin has also reinstated the alliance between the Russian Orthodox Church and Government - as in the days of the Czars. The Church supported Putin and in return, Putin agreed to begin persecution of all other religions, as in the old times. How can the Russian Orthodox Church be the true church if it is supporting persecution of other Christians? One religion, one party, what's next? The door has all but closed for evangelism, and gathering in homes to exercise religious liberty is now a crime. What makes the west so strong and free, is their willingness to accept various religious beliefs, allowing them to freely exercise worship. Alexandr Solzhnitsyn believed that the problems of the world were spiritual, not political. He believed that what Russia needed to do more than anything else was to repent for the suffering she had caused. In 1983, when he was awarded the prestigious Templeton Prize, in his acceptance speech, he said that if he had to sum up the World's problems in a few words he would say "Men have forgotten God."

    Glasnost lifted restrictions in Russia for outside Christian ministries. Hannu Haukka (a family friend from Vancouver BC) meets a Finnish girl in Russian Karelia, marries her and they start the largest ministry ever in Russia. 1990 IRR/TV received 1,000,000 letters in response to Superbook a children's Bible cartoon series aired on Soviet State TV Channel One. The Moscow post office is swamped. Great Commission - Christian broadcasting to Russia, by Hannu Haukka CEO, from Vancouver BC.

     

    Finnish Society underwent a profound transition in the last part of the second millennium, and continues in the new one. On the 1st of January 1995, Finland joined the European Union (EU, former EEC or EC), losing a lot of her autonomy in the process. Twenty years later, Finland had only 20% of her former self left, and if she stays, all Finnishness will be erased. Even the language has a distinct English accent especially in Helsinki. Serious questions have raised as to the value of belonging to a union that takes away everything and gives back nothing worth anything but trade and even that is too controlled. Discontent is rising in all the EU countries. Finland is participating in the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU); the currency (markka, abbr. mk or FIM) is now replaced by Euro (with a ratio of 5.94571 FIM = 1 euro). (There are so many songs in Finland with Markka in it. Will they have to change the words? "Ei ole mulla Euroja taskussa..." = I don't have any Markkas in my pocket..)


    Finland supports Turkey's bid to join EU, and has not recognized the Armenian Genocide by Turkey. This is just political correctness played with over a million innocent Christians massacred by Turks. Turkey is outwardly a "democratic" free country but inwardly a repressive typical Islamic regime, though somewhat less than other countries in the region.

    Turkey wants to project an image satisfactory to the people of EU, but it is (in the opinion of the writer) a dishonest image. Their Constitution guarantees "Freedom of Religion," but in practice it represses all religions but Islam. In 2012, reports by 700 Club have reported that Turkey has moved further towards Islamic Fundamentalism. Murders of Christians go unpunished and soon there will be no Christians in Turkey. Is this the country Europe wants to join? This criminal organization? The Ottomans destroyed Christianity in Turkey and now the administration is finishing the job.

    Atom Egoyan's film Ararat is about the Armenian Genocide by Turkey. (see DVD in left column) In 2007, United States Senate has proclaimed the killing of at least one million Armenian Christians in Turkey as genocide, a charge they deny. Turkey was the country that was trying to take over Europe in the Middle Ages. Now are Europeans thinking of inviting them to take over? A Muslim country will never be a truly open, or free, society although each one claims to be just that. Turkey has one of the highest number of journalists in prison, surpassing China and Iran. (BBC 2011)


    No country in EU represses religion, but this will change if Turkey joins. Christians who preach in Turkey are typically arrested and jailed for two years and released just before the trial. That's not all, Turkey is increasingly being ruled by the Muslim leaders, as in Iran and Iraq. Most Christians have left. How is this country able to fit into a European "free" society? It is impossible. It would be a disaster, with even more Muslims in Europe, adding to the present disasterous numbers. Former Finnish president Halonen would have welcomed Turkey into EU, despite gross human rights violations, showing that Liberal minded thinkers are willing to accept anything, even if it is not in the interest of the country. If you are a Christian living in Europe and you want to start a church in Turkey, you will be jailed. Nothing in Islam guarantees freedom of worship, in fact it encourages its members to wipe out any other religion. It is crazy thinking to adopt such a country, but crazy thinking regarding the Islamic threat has ruled in Finland since Kekkonen.

    Which path has Finland chosen to set for itself? The new millennium has brought many potential traps to which unwary nations could easily become prey. By joining EU, it has set its path with the collective, which means much less control of ones own destiny. The folly of EU becomes the folly of Finland. The successes of EU become the successes of Finland, at least in theory. More and more countries are having second thoughts due to almost total control of internal affairs. Is this not what Finland has fought in three wars to avoid?



    Many Finns are just beginning to find out exactly what it means to be in this union, and some are having second thoughts about losing their hard fought for and won, independence. Once again, Finland and the Finnish language is in a minority position in a larger union. The Finns are generally very enthusiastic about this relationship, but not all news is positive about the EU affects on the Finnish people, especially farmers. There is also a lesson from the past. In the late 1600's when Finnish troops were fighting Sweden's battles, far away from their land, Finland was attacked by Russians, which ended up being a massive setback for all Baltic Finns. Could this be repeated if war breaks out and Finnish troops have to go defend Central Europe, leaving Finland vulnerable?

    The future of Finnish culture and language is daily becoming increasingly fragile. Not only is Finland engulfed in EU, a massive surrender of sovereignty, but the people embrace western culture to a great extent, and in their enthusiasm to do so, have suffered linguistic and cultural decrement recently to powerful, magnetic Americanism that is readily available through all media sources. There are many ways Finns could suffer greatly in this union and immigration is now the biggest one. Nothing against immigrants, but we must use our brains and see what has happened in other European countries and learn.

    Finnish language is unique, musical and beautiful and should always be appreciated or it may, in the near future, be lost. The Finnish vocabulary, being agglutinative, is self-defining, and offers unlimited combinations to form meanings. "Keuhkoputkentulehdus" is formed from three words: keuhko, (lung) putki, (tube) and tulehdus (inflammation). The definition is contained in the word itself. English words, by contrast, can only achieve a few forms and meanings, and you have to remember the definition. But Finnish has already been radically adultrated by English words, and that's a "fakta" - and they listen to their favorite music "biisi" or piece. The Finnish "kappale" and "pala" no longer work to describe music.

    The internet has brought the world closer together alright, The average Finn spends 3 hours per day watching television, and now there's the internet with Facebook and the rest of the social media. No wonder they are picking up these words so quickly. Listening to Finnish programs on TV or the Internet vividly shows the radical changes as every few words are English with a Finnish ending. I am used to that being an immigrant to Canada, but now it is happening in Finland. Not only that but the speech is sounding more flat, devoid of the colorful sounds and rhythm that are usually heard from various provinces. We who have immigrated many years ago still speak the same way we did when we got here, and Pirkko Kiansten's radio show from the University of Victoria is a perfect example. We have received comments about how beautiful here speech sounds compared to the degraded speech heard on the evening news in Finland. [Pirkko] Perhaps there are some changes to be made... The January 2003 programming for TV2: 9 American films, 4 Finnish films and 3 other. Finland faces West, even past its EU brothers.

    Most Finns are Lutherans on paper, but not in practice. Finland has become secularized, a country of pagans with one foot in their traditional religion just to be safe. Maybe, they hope, God will be kind to them dispute their ignoring Him. This has happened pretty much at the same time as secularization in all Western countries. Only about three percent of Finns attend church regularly. You might say Finland is spiritually impoverished. As a result of this spiritual vacuum, Islam is beginning to make gains as it has in Sweden and the rest of Europe. This is a bad sign for the future in my opinion, as Islam in a country is worse than not having any beliefs, as it is a totalitarian ideology that is seeking world domination at the moment.


    This is Finland

    Finland: A Rising Nationality, by Peter Kropotkin - 1885 observations about Finland and Finnish people. "Never having been a personal serf, he is not servile; he always maintains his personal dignity and speaks with the same grave intonation and self-respect to a Russian Tsar as to his neighbour. A lymphatic temperament, slowness of movement and of thought, and sullen indifference have often been imputed to him.

    Finland has not scrapped its fleet of steam locomotives. There are 140 of them all ready to go, all over Finland. Little Finland will not be paralyzed by Russia cutting of the oil.

    Alexis Kivi was a very important writer at a time when Finland was beginning to assert its own nationhood after seven hundred years in the Swedish realm and a hundred years associated with Russia. His most famous book is Seven Brothers. Story From Seven Brothers (in a sauna) by Alexis Kivi

    All nationalities have their specialties. The Finns make the best, and the most varieties of rye bread.

    Rye bread plus">

    Historical background on Finnish Bread.

    And you've got to try the Karelian Pie.



    Red Sky in The Morning


    What is the future of Finland based on how its policies are shaping the country today? To answer this in context of what is happening in neighboring countries, Europe and the world in general is extremely complex. I had to toss political correctness into the garbage can where it belongs, for it wars against truth continually. So far, political correctness has the upper hand, but it is doomed to fall. The big question mark is Islam, and the problem is bad data which is filtered information at best and disinformation at worst. By the way this has nothing to do with racism or xenophobia or fear of people who are different, as religion is not a race and besides this discussion is not about religion but any violent ideology including Fascism and Islam, which on the surface has the appearance of peace but scratch through to the inside and you find violence at its core. It is hidden from site, but it is there. It is a stealth ideology that works slowly so we don't notice it. I completely reject and challenge the current politically correct notion of the character of Islam. Right away I will get accusations from all kinds of idealistic individuals just going by hearsay from people in authority or "trusted" news sources. Most of them are wrong and scared of even thinking that what they see with their senses might be wrong, that Islam must be a peaceful religion. There are peaceful Muslims but there are parts of the Quran and their other reference books that reveal the true nature of this misunderstood religion. Once you have seen it with your own eyes, your opinion will never be the same, and you will be angry at being deceived. That is Allah's deception for us and so far it is working. This page works to destroy the works of Allah.
    Islamic deception propaganda
    Media bias against Isael.

    Threats to our freedom do not always come from the East; it can now come from the south. Just look at France and Britain. They are under a full-blown attack and can do nothing about it now. It is too late. Basically, all I'm doing is asking us to wake up and see what is happening in other countries and project that forward, extrapolate to our future situation. Can we prevent the same fate? I don't know, but not talking about it will not help. Pretending everything is fine will not help; I think most people will agree. Talk, discuss, argue, and the truth will slowly emerge - this is true freedom. Silence and "sacred cows" are the enemy. Islam is a works religion meaning your good deeds and bad deeds are weighed, and it just so happens that killing unbelievers is a good deed. That is exactly why Christians are being hunted down by ISIS in Iraq today, not just because they are bad people. Islam made them bad. So why are there so many peaceful Muslims? That is a good question: it is because they willfully disobey their own religion, or they are not taught that in their Mosque, which happens. A lot of Muslims leave their religion once they know the truth, but many do not, and these could be dangerous. Just research it yourself and you will have to change your mind if you go along with Obama's refrain that "no religion is a religion of violence." Don't be so lazy! This is serious. Christianity is a grace and forgiveness based religion; Islam wants revenge, which perpetuates a cycle of violence. ISIS is doing exactly what Muhammad did; they are not an aberration of the religion. Arab culture has always been a culture of war. There has never been a time when Arabs were not fighting each other. Tit-for-tat raids were normal and the fearless warrior was glorified. Muhammad believed that the Arab custom was good and he went on about 66 raids himself. It supplied slaves, women and booty, and it still does. The young men were eager to join in the fun, and when Muhammad told them if they were killed they would go straight to heaven and get 72 virgins, that sealed the deal. So it was easy for Muhammad to use that for his own end, and it continues today. We don't want that transplanted to our peace loving realm. ISIS is Alibaba with an Islamic ideology. Islam is a culture of death and we have to face it. They willingly go to their deaths and send their children to die for their god. It is time to help the Christians being beheaded in the Middle East and forget Muslims for awhile. They have been ignored too long. Let's do the right thing for once and report what is going on and put the blame where it belongs.

    A free society is classless, and enjoys freedom of speech where all may not agree but they agree to disagree without retribution. That is not where Finland is going with its gag laws and self censorship. Islam, like Communism, has two classes. In Communism it was all those who belong to the party, who enjoy various perks. In Islam it is master and slave or infidel, if you are fortunate in not being executed. The slave must pay a tax to the Muslim in a truly Islamic society, since that is Muhammad's command. ISIS robbed all the Christians of their belongings and executed thousands. This is what Muhammad did so they are not doing anything wrong from their point of view and the point of view of an ever increasing number of discontent Muslims around the world, even next door.
    CBN NEWS

    I came to the conclusion that in Finland, as in other countries, the Media is partly to blame by spreading a false image of Islam to the people and that is speeding up Finland's fate, whatever it may be. Next, the question that came to mind was what is in it for these media to put out false information? What is stopping them from putting on air both sides of the argument and give the people an informed opinion rather than the party line. They seem to know what they should say rather than reporting fact regarding Islam and related subjects. A balanced view is impossible due to government liberal policies. You can kill an economy with liberal policies run amuck, and that is what happened to dying American cities such as Detroit. I believe free speech for all including the media is imperative in a free society, but laws now forbid telling the truth because the truth is stranger than fiction, and you shouldn't hurt anyone's feelings. Who can stand criticism nowadays? It is now called "bigotry." The problem is nobody wants to get involved and self censorship is everywhere. The Christian churches in the West just rolled over and played dead: they dropped the ball and allowed Islam to push out Christianity and bring in Islam in many parts of Europe and America. They too were crippled by political correctness, having tossed out truth by changing church beliefs. The worst instance was when hundreds of Christian leaders signed a document accepting that Allah was the same as the God of Christians and Jews. That is fundamentally incorrect; the two are diametrically opposed. That is doing violence to their own religion; an abominable act. No Muslims would say that their Quran and the Bible are the same. The Bible says "my people perish for lack of knowledge, and that is a good example. Listen, we all want peace between our two groups, but they have not intention of stopping their push to obey their founder, i.e. to make Islam the only world religion. Finland has become too much like a police state, in regards to suppressing free speech, and it was said by Thomas Jefferson that if the government fears the people you have good government, but if the people fear the government you have tyranny. But it is worse now; truth loving people have to fear their own people who feel that we should accept everything without exception. After all, we must be "inclusive." This just plain ignorant.; not everything is good for our country.

    Credibility is paramount in a content site. Do I exist to tickle the ears of my readers, or am I here to speak the truth? I just want to say that as an interested person I have studied this subject for longer than any Finn that I know of. Take or reject it, it is the truth. However, if I put down here everything I know about this subject I could be arrested and they would call it hate speech, or inciting violence against minorities or some silly excuse, as in all socialist countries. Telling the truth is no longer allowed in Finland nor almost anywhere else, if it concerns religion, never mind that Islam is 80% politics. The Saudis are partly to blame. We are told that Islam is just another religion like Christianity or Buddhism. I am sorry to say it is not. No other religion preaches hatred of other religions, which are supposed to be destroyed, or forced conversion. The concern for the peace of Finland is also that any identifiable group that is accidentally or on purpose offended, that has a habit of rioting, is not an element that can be a healthy addition to Finland in large numbers. This reaction is not limited to Muslims but any group that separates itself from the rest by race or religion. We love them all, but resisting integration and insisting on breaking the laws of the land as we see in Britain and France, have crossed the line. We should not condone rebellion from immigrants for whom we have bent over backwards to help. They should be sent back if found guilty.

    Islam is not an Abrahamic religion as claimed for one thing, because it denies everything Abraham stands for. Even if only one-half of what I claim is true, it is still more than what you will see and hear on the media. Lying is also done by omission; truth has nothing to hide. Lying for Allah is part of Islam; truth is the exclusive domain of the Bible. We have (most western nations) become truth deniers. The result: Finland is at a crossroads to its own history, and it has to make a decision to do the right thing or go down the drain of history. We are doing bad things and we should know it in our hearts, but we are willfully blocking this out. This includes the destruction of our next generation and inviting a demonic, deceptive religion to set up shop in our country. We choose to disregard the truth. The biggest objection I find is that the Muslims they know are all nice people. Russians, Japanese and Germans are nice people too, but they tried to kill and control us in WWII. It has nothing whatsoever to do with how nice people are. This is wartime whether we like it or not. more.... We need to spread the word; please send this page to your social media.

      Brutus:
      There is a tide in the affairs of men.
      Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;
      Omitted, all the voyage of their life
      Is bound in shallows and in miseries.
      On such a full sea are we now afloat,
      And we must take the current when it serves,
      Or lose our ventures.

      Julius Caesar Act 4, scene 3, 218-224


    The above quote refers to a time sensitive situation in a civil war where a decision is needed immediately as one side has an advantage numerically while the other side is rapidly growing in numbers. We see this situation rapidly developing in Europe today, most advanced in France and England. We are slowly being outnumbered by those who have sworn to rule over us. We can bury our heads in the sand or take decisive action now.

    The left-wing government decided to put a stop to criticism of Islam with gag laws. This is typical of socialist society: fix problems by removing a freedom rather than determining the root causes and dealing with it properly - until none is left. This is prevented from happening because of the philosophy of political correctness that is a cornerstone of our society now. Taken to its logical conclusion we have a closed society like all the others. People that value security more than freedom deserve neither. You might say that we should not allow people to run down other peoples' religion. I agree, but what if politics is part of that religion and the religion is protecting an evil political agenda just below the surface? Would it be permissible to criticize the politics, or would that be criticizing the religion? What political party is protected from criticism? Islam! All the wars, kidnappings, murders are now mostly from Muslims or from other Fascist-like ideologies. We are doing everything in our politically correct power to avoid the inevitable conclusion: the problem is with Islam itself and it cannot be reformed without ripping out pages from the Quran. We have an enemy that wants to die (it is their greatest desire) and who wants to destroy us, and we don't know how many are in our country already. Their secret is in their brainwashed minds. The problem is not the people, but the ideology as it is with Fascism or Communism or any other system that is anti-freedom. We don't blame the German people, or the Russian people; we blame their ideology that is carried forward in a relatively small minority that affects the rest. So we saw the carnage in purges and two World Wars as a result of deception of the people, and we still see the same thing today. Violence is the means to an end as taught by Muhammad, a warrior chief who invented a religion that could take over the world by violence under the banner of religion. He went on at least 66 campaigns taking slaves, booty and converting or killing the enemy, which is defined as all unbelievers. That is you and me. Do we hear about these things in school or on TV? Absolutely not; that would be hate speech, which is what truth has become. Hamas, Al Qaeda, Muslim Brotherhood are all the same. They are indistinguishable from their beliefs. A large percentage of immigrant Muslims carry this ideology with them and can infect the rest at any time, and even force other Muslims to join them. The result is a ticking time bomb in Europe. We have two mutually exclusive ideologies: freedom and slavery. Don't take my word for it; check it out yourself. Muslims know it; we don't because the President of the United States has said "Islam is a religion of peace" and it has been repeated world wide. Muslim leaders murmur to each other that it is amazing, they are lying to their people! How lucky can they be, and how unlucky for us. Check the Internet, and especially fortressoffaith.org. Whenever there is an attack on American soldiers by their Muslim allies, it is assumed that it was because of some personal grievance. Never is Islam itself implicated, though the Quran specifically grants the permission to kill any infidel. We must at least give that option a look before ascribing it to some grievance. This attitude extends to all Muslims, since we assume that all the killing is our fault based on historical events, and they dig up example such as colonialism and the Crusades. They just take the focus off the real cause: the dictates of Islam itself and the longer we deny that the more people will be put at risk. We must wake up and reject the silly political correctness path we, along with most of the free world, have chosen. Finland needs immigrants until the issue of destroying our next generation has been solved, if ever. Women should be offered adoption before any other option as the baby is innocent and Finland needs every one of them. We should do the right thing. As the Muslims' rampage ratchets up to new levels in the Middle East daily, Christians are being forced to convert or die. They are fleeing by the thousands. If we need people, let's help them first, then the ones who are doing it. This would solve our supposed need for workers and help the persecuted Christians too.

    Gaza hospital terror centers

    What Islam does to people who come under its influence.

    Freedom of speech is an inalienable right of all people, but not of Muslims according to their law. If we respect their laws, that means our freedom of speech will conform to their laws. They should conform to ours in my opinion or we will loose our freedoms. When emigrating, it is understood that the other country's laws must be obeyed. This is serious stuff we ignor at our peril. Nobody can take away debate on any issue in a free society. If we do not want a free society, then we can support censorship, which can strangle our ability to advance as a people or even destroy us due to decisions made with false information. People of the world are all different: colors, religions, customs and so forth. None of these are the problem. Political ideology is the problem, not religion, and that has been proven in the last century with wars that cost millions of lives. Fascism and Communism have been discredited. No problem for the forces of evil that brought us the previous batch. They just brought forward a new batch and it is ravaging thousands at this very moment under the disguise of being a religion of peace.

    We humans are hard headed; we hear something on TV said by someone in high position and we accept that as truth because of who that person is. By doing so, we often reject the real truth. As a result, I believe the media pick up this "truth" spoken by someone who knows nothing of the complex subject, but rather saying what they feel they must politically, and therefore they are giving the people false information - what they want to hear regarding this whole Islam issue. Most of them are afraid to report the truth, and that is coward ism. There is also too much willful ignorance in the world today. They fail to report what they should, but instead say nice things about a bad ideology and even some bad people trying to administer it. They lie that Islam and Christianity are the same and fail to state the truth that Islam rejects even the crucifixion of Jesus and the Biblical story of Abraham while claiming to be an Abrahamic religion. There is only one Abrahamic religion, and the second one supposedly coming down through Ishmael, a child that Abraham disowned and banished for being a violent brat, contradicts the first, so the first one is the correct one. Socialist ideology rejects Christianity but accepts and protects Islam as a valid alternative for some reason, probably hatred of the former, and this is a threat to Finnish people. These ignorant elite want Islam to counter Christianity within our culture, and that is playing with fire. I say these things knowing that there is personal risk, but someone has to counter the accepted inaccurate information (dare I say lies) put out by the media. Shame on the media for not reporting the truth. Part of the reason is that many of the networks are now owned by Muslims advancing their cause and others repeat their lies. Finland that would be Finnish News Agency (STT), YLE, Aamulehti, Helsingin Sanomat...
    Newspapers Top News Waking up to the danger of Islam What's happening in Islam - can happen here.

    So of course it will anger some who still cling to the fairy tale versions where the heroes are Obama, terrorist organizations such as Muslim Brotherhood, Palestinian freedom fighters, Isis and Hamas etc; Multiculturalism, socialism, and even Islam. Why does the world always have to go down the wrong path and end up in a war just to start it all over again? Anyway, in this version of fantasy, Allah and Jehovah, Islam and Christianity are the same. The villains in Fantasyland are Christians, truth, Israel, patriotism, democracy, pro-life, Jesus Christ and their affiliates. They are living in a comic strip version of reality. Now the truth, if you can handle it - I hope you can. If not, just skip this because it will make you mad. Don't shoot the messenger. I think Tom Cruz said it best and it applies to many situations: "you can't handle the truth" - or can you? Give it a try.

    In defense of our Christian heritage, I should point out that it still is the best model for morality and freedom in any society whether you believe in God or not. Islam on the other hand creates discontent by its very nature. Everyone on Islam is trapped there, not being allowed to criticize it nor to leave. The young men believe that their problems are caused by Jews or Christians etc. because that is what they have been taught. They never realize it is their own religion, their own minds and what is in there. Christianity is freedom, as Jesus came to set the captives, including Muslims, free. How can Christianity be true if Evolution is true? They both can't be: this is true. I have years of biology and anthropology and I always knew there was something wrong with the theory I was being taught as I was working toward my degree, but it fit politically. Science, to the interpretation of it, now is used to justify policy. Why should we keep the faith that our fathers passed to us? Here's why Evolution as taught in schools is false. 1/2

    Evolution is false. 2/2

    As you know, the demographic changes in the last half of the 20th Century were profound and unprecedented in Europe. Some call it an Islamic invasion. That description might be more accurate than we can perceive right now. This demographic shift can be used by those who have evil intentions. In fact there exists a master plan to infiltrate countries and work from the inside using the country's own resources and support, that was found in a raid on Islamic Brotherhood (Obama's friends) affiliates in United States. With a president like Obama, who needs enemies. The documents found support this theory, revealing a complex plan to take over countries by stealth working from the inside. Building kindred like-minded populations is key to this plan and so is indoctrinating children to believing Allah is the one and only god. These children then become judges and government that will work for the enemy, most having already turned their backs on their traditional beliefs. The enemy has strong beliefs; we, as a nation, have none or it is weak. We all know that Finns can fight an enemy on their own turf if that enemy attacks from the front door, but what if it doesn't, instead masterfully using cunning deception.

    My father, like every Finnish 20 year old male, was in the Finnish Army when Russia attacked in November 30 1939, having joined in June, and we should know what happened to the attackers. We are almost invincible if fighting an army of equal strength or even twice as strong, especially if we ask the creator for His help as we did then. Speaking of relatively strong beliefs, every field unit prayed before battle, and every man participated. That gave strength to our soldiers that they would not otherwise have. There are no atheists in fox-holes and besides a little insurance was worth having. I have however, noticed that we do not have any defenses for an attack if the enemy tries to come in through the back door, by stealth. That is their winning strategy that we have been slow to catch on to. Muslims are nice people don't get me wrong, and I like them one-on-one, but their ideology, with a religious facade, has a big, big problem. The reason is that Islam and Christianity are not the same and because we believe a lie, we allow and even welcome Islam, which is Satan's tool to bring down nations under a deity called Allah. No, it is not the same as Jehovah God in case you are interested. I am not going into the details but it is a growing problem in Europe, one we dare not ignore. I'll let Tom Wallace explain the difference, (link below) and the threat in detail. France and England have Muslim problems now, and it has spread northward. You must understand, Islam does not worship the traditional God of Finns. I know that is what they claim, but it does not stand up to scrutiny. All you have to do is compare what the two Gods' attributes and it becomes clear: most are opposites. But they are both Abrahamic religions! Not really. Abraham's son Isaac is; but Ishmael is not. In fact, because of the differences, Abraham sent Ishmael, the father of Arab people, into the desert with his mother. He was a trouble maker, and we see that his decedents are too. It has never ended with the Arabs. Rockets rain down on Israel non-stop, but Israel is doing everything to try and stop it and they get the blame. There are some similarities and they are paraded as representative of the religion. Don't be fooled.

    Evil systems have never entered any country as evil; they would not be allowed in. Most were welcomed in under false pretenses, such as Fascism and Communism which actually came to steal, kill and destroy. The Trojans tricked the Athenians as well and Athens fell. We believe we are immune to being fooled because of our own pride that believes we are too smart to fall for deception. Isn't it strange how history keeps repeating itself.

    The United States became the model of freedom under Christian principles, not Muslim or any other. There is no evidence that greater freedom and prosperity comes from any other set of beliefs than the one adopted by the founding fathers of the greatest nation the world has ever seen, but which our last two generations mostly abandoned. Sadly, these principles have been tossed into the garbage, and cracks in the system are appearing and the country is also turning away from Israel in favor of her enemies. The Bible says that God will curse those who curse Israel. A two country solution for Israel? When Israel gave up Gaza for peace, the result was a hail of rockets. When Israel retaliated it was not the attackers (Arabs) who were blamed but the defenders. Why is this almost universal now? Imagine what would happen if Israel gave up strategic land to their enemies as most of the West, under pressure from oil rich Muslim countries, now demands? Israel would be no more. The rockets are from civilian areas, schools etc. When Israel retaliates, the world's reaction is horror and Israel is the villain - because of the media bias. The founding fathers had it right, but it is now wrong. The first Chief Justice of the United States, John Jay They knew that only a nation with Christian values can remain free and prosperous. In 1965 Ted Kennedy (supposedly Christian) changed the future of America forever by pushing for more Asian, African and Middle East Muslim and less European immigration into America. Now Muslim values are being considered as valid for America by a Muslim president who makes jokes about Christian values. How dumb is that? Look what these values are doing right now in the countries of origin. That is just getting off the track established by Christian values which was working and American prosperity is the proof. Let's get back to the path that works and turn America and Europe around by doing the right thing. If America does the right thing, the rest of the world will follow.

    The real Islam explained

    Churches become Mosques. Islamic Call To Prayer in German Christian Church



    Wafa Sultan
    Listen Fortress of Faith

    Brigitte Gabriel grew up in Christian Lebanon and was there when
    Muslims took over and slaughtered all non Muslims. She is determined not to let that happen in America. We need the same spirit in Finland.


    Finnish language website to educate Finns about Islam
    SPECIAL REPORT ON ISLAM (March 15 +)



    Farmers in India suicide because of GM crops.
    Germany kicks out GMO company.
    GMO Map
    GMO food news - STOP GMO and Monsanto
    GMO for Africa - Bill Gates pushing GMO there.
    Dupont and Monsanto - duopoly on seed supply in South Africa


    BACK TO THE TOP










    Books on Finland