Topics: Maps, culture, history, pictures, language, literature, listen to music, songs, products, human rights, threats to culture and religion from outside Finland, news; Uralic City Center - where you can find books, CDs, Videos etc. and lots more on the way. Land grabs by Russia 1944-45.
The Uralic Family of languages is comprised of two branches: 1) Finno-Ugric, and 2) Samoyedic. The Baltic Finnish/Karelian and Estonian (Finnic), Hungarian (Ugric) and Lapp (Saami "saw-me") people belong to this distinct group of linguistically related people. Uralic people are by definition indigenous people of the northern regions between the Urals and Norway. Ancient Finno-Ugric people even hunted in Central Europe at least during periods of glaciation. If this is the case, assimilation of these northern tribes has been going on for over ten thousand years. The process has been so gradual that their language has been preserved though genetically Finns are to a great extent European. The Finno-Ugric language in Europe has died out thousands of years ago, and thus there are no pockets of the language south of Norway and Sweden. The evidence for their European domicile during the last glaciation comes from Mitochondrial DNA evidence. See Finno-Ugric Distribution Theory
Some believe that until a thousand years ago, Finland was occupied only by Saami and that Finns migrated from the east and settled there, even as late as the first millennium. This theory has been disproven and ancestors of Finns have been there and also over a large area much longer, as the agreement between DNA, archeology and linguistic theory has shown. These people deserve to rule in the northwest Europe, their ancestral home, and they are not giving up that hope. Russians believe they are just as entitled to the land as the Finns. However precedents have been set internationally, as in Canada, whereby it is acknowledged that indigenous people are entitled to their land and the resources on it, that they can develop and benefit from as they see fit. Russian governments in the past have simply raped the resources and left the people with nothing. Canadians are beginning to become more civilized, at least on paper, but the follow-through has been slow and most often default has been the outcome.
The writer's own theory of Finno-Ugric occupation of the North has solid research backing which opens the door to even greater possibilities in the quest for ancient origins of Finns. The estimated resource area per person is between 0.1 - 0.5 sq. km. to survive in the north, and this meant travel in the vast Boreal Forests. Boat People Theory To traverse the huge numbers of lakes in Finland in winter, early Finns invented ice skates. International precedents have been set in Canada for giving back land that was simply taken by treachery, and these talks should begin between all the Finnish tribes and their Russian masters. It is a colonial system whose time has come to finally close.
There are many related groups in the former Soviet Union, most of which are quickly being assimilated into the dominant Russian language and culture. This has lately begun to be reversed, but it is a gigantic task. Just as the western Finns have had Germanic influence, the eastern Finnish cultures have developed with many Turkic/Indo-Iranian and Slavic cultural, religious and linguistic influences. The eastern Finnish languages cannot be understood by Finns today as contacts to the east have been more or less cut for eight hundred years of Russian history. At times, glaciers also separated the Eastern Finno-Ugric people from their relatives that once extended from the Netherlands to the shores of the Black Sea in the South. So of course Finns would have some "Eastern" genes since their hunting and trading range to the East may have reached Siberia.
Place-names which stretch all the way to the Ural mountains are ancient Finnish related in origin which can be seen in the map section. Many place names have similar prefixes although they might be several thousand kilometers apart. Finno-Ugric place names based on the root "sum" and "sam" testify to the large area Finns once called their land. "Suursuomi" movement or the idea of rebuilding a larger Finland that Slavs conquered, gained strength in 1941 when the Finns set out to take back land Russia annexed the year before. Stalin had grossly underestimated Finnish ingenuity, determination and stamina.
Many Finns and Estonians have a keen interest in their relatives to the east with whom many still feel some kinship ties. Recently, due to events in Russia against Finno-Ugric people by Moscow, there has been increased interest in this topic from many countries.
Finnish culture is very Scandinavian in style, but Finno-Ugric origins make the people distinct in many ways.
Who are the Uralic people? Where did they come from? Where do they live? What is their language and culture like? And more specifically, who are the Baltic Finns? This web page explores these and many other questions relating to Uralic people: their past, present and future. We cannot do anything about the past, and the present is now, but we have the power to affect the future of the Finno-Ugric people, and the Finnish people are no exception. That is why I devote a section right here to analysis of what direction Finland has taken, which I believe to be good, and which I believe could destroy the culture, not immediately but in the distant future for sure.
One cannot understand Finnish language, history and culture without some knowledge of related people. Finnish history and culture are presented against a background of the other Finno-Ugric people, the original Europeans. (Fin.) Finnish written history is only from the second millennium, but fortunately the Finns have a strong oral tradition going back to the ice ages. Finns, and Karelian tribes in particular, had a strong oral tradition of rune singing their history of their ancient shamanistic beliefs, myth, magic, love and war. These traditions survived in Karelia probably because of the relative isolation from the early Finnish church. These stories were collected in the 19th Century and compiled into one story, composed of a masterful collection of epic poems that reveal the daily life of the people over millennia. Karelia has a long history going back over eight thousand years. Today, Finns love their Kalevala which is read and enjoyed as a rich historical and mythological legacy of their ancestors. One reason for this is that Finns know that they have a glorious past that has been buried by official versions of history propagated during the time Finland was a part of Sweden and continued today in schools. We view the whole history of the Finnish people as open to revision by scientific multidisciplinary investigation. As for the reliability of the information contained here, of course there may be some outdated material as some sources are very old. One of the greatest values in historical study is that the further back we look, the further forward we are able to see. The more cultures and religions we understand, the better we can manage our own cultures and religions, or what we believe to be true. Too little knowledge about important subjects is a dangerous thing, and here I try to open up your desire to know more about certain subjects that are timely and urgent so you can decide for yourself. If I have stimulated your curiosity at least, I will have succeeded.
The Finnish tribes ruled the North since the last Ice Age. A thousand years ago, the slavs began intercepting Karelian trade with the Norwegians and Volga traders. The map section shows the areas they used in their wilderness trips. When the population exploding slavs came and took over the key trading posts to the East, they forced the inhabitants to move West. Timing is everything; the Slavs were two hundred years too late. By the time Russians arrived, the Perm ivory trade was in decline as new sources became available in Africa. Trading posts in Northwest Russia that were established by Finns were reestablished by Russians (e.g. Ustjug). Most of them were taken from their original owners by force after they made several friendly visits. Finns joined the Swedish Army to prevent Russians from occupying all of Finnish lands. Though the Russian chronicles state that they were fighting Swedes, the truth is that they were fighting Finns trying to keep what is theirs: their lands. You see Swedes never tried to turn Finns into Swedes, but Russians have been Russifying Finns from the time they entered their lands back in the 11th Century. It was providential that the Western Finns were "protected" by Sweden for 700 years, which gave this nation the opportunity to become what it is today rather than suffer genocide and absorption. Both Sweden and Russia fought for control of the land between Lake Onega and the Baltic, but the real owners of this land are Baltic Finns themselves, mainly Tavastians, Karelians (Eastern and Western), Veps, (Southeastern Karelians) and Ingrians who live between Estonia and Karelia.
Since the last war, misinformation flooded the world's knowledge base and many false teachings have been spread about the Finns, Karelians and their rightful heritage in the north. These must be set straight. Viipuri (Vyborg) for example, which is not far from St. Petersburg, on the Gulf of Finland, was established by Finns and built by Finns - not Russians. Russian pamphlets state that the natural harbor city of Viipuri used to belong to Russia (when Finland was for a time a Russian Grand Duchy with an autonomous government) and now it is back with the rightful owners. Finland "belonged" to Sweden a lot longer than it did Russia, in fact about 700 years. The fact is that Viipuri and indeed all of Karelia (to the shores of Onega) and Finland belong to the Finnish people. After the War, Russians Settled occupied Karelia with people from all over Russia. The world has a lot to say about how Israelis are settling occupied territories on the West Bank. Russia has been occupying occupied areas for a thousand years, right up to 1944. Karelians want their land back. The Japanese want their Islands back. Poland wants their land back. Sure, by international diplomacy these people are being polite, "forgiving" and not being demanding enough, but they do want their land back and that will never go away. But all we see is how the Arabs want their land back. Shouldn't everyone get their land back? At least the Israelis bought land that nobody else wanted because it was desert. So the brilliant Israeli scientists made the desert bloom, and now they want it back - land they bought! Russia just takes and kills everyone or sends them off to Siberia - then Russifies the population, which is genocide.Russia's land grabs.
You will also find famous Finnish products, CD's, Videos, books and other links provided for your convenience and enjoyment at the Uralic City Center. Check out Pirkko Kiansten's Internet radio show Saturday mornings 9:30 - 11:00 AM Pacific time. Uralica is happy to offer some of Pirkko's finest shows from archived files, over 50 hours to date. She appreciates your feedback; to keep her on the air, please let her know that you are listening.
Finnish music has reached a peak in the last 50 years. The quality and quantity of music ranging from classical to chamber choir music has no rivals in the world today, even from larger countries.
If you are interested in war history, may I recommend Antti's exclusive WW2 Continuation War Photo Gallery. There are dozens of photos taken in 1941-42 on Lake Laatokka (Ladoga), scanned from our family album. Some of the material you will find very controversial, but I have stated everything truthfully to the best of my knowledge and experience. I hope you enjoy your stay and that you will come back often to see what's new. Please bookmark it now for future reference.
The Return of Karelia
Karelians are waiting for their land to be returned because it was taken illegally. Russia signed the (Atlantic Charter, 1942) which means they promised not to engage in land grabbing in exchange for foreign aid. Now that Karelia is occupied by Russia, Putin has embarked upon a restructuring of historical facts to consolidate these gains as legitimate.
In researching sources such as the Encyclopaedia Britannica be aware that it may contain Soviet era disinformation regarding areas they "liberated." The elite have always had their way, employing writers to write or invent history. They are very clever at it, and you can easily miss the lie or omission if you don't have enough background information to spot it. For example, when Finland was attacked by Russia, fancy weapons were scarce, so they invented the Molotov Cocktail, a solution of flammable liquid that destroyed tanks. Now these thieves are claiming it was their invention all along. Actually, historians place the creation in the Spanish civil war, but the term was coined by the Finns. Putin and company in Russia are very busy at changing history right now. Whether or not something is "true" is not important to these people if they want it for their new and "improved" Russia. They want to erase any negatives and make the school-yard bullies, the Great (ethnic) Russians, saints. The intention here is to correct history, not alter it, and to expose misinformation and disinformation. Finland stands at the crossroads of history: to continue developing as a Nation, or merge into a One World Government filled with Tyranny and loss of identity. If she allows pagan religions to take over, as in the past 20 years, there will be a major shift in the religious/cultural picture that may cause a violent reaction. A group of Bankers (mainly Jewish - nothing against Jewishness) and Super Rich have initiated a plan to finalize the plan of merging into a One World Government and the people will be essentially slaves. An old Finnish saying: SE PUU KAATUU, JOKA JUURENSA UNOHTAA means that the tree that forgets its roots will fall. The Christian religion as practices by the Finns, in and outside the school system and the military, and Finnish SISU have been the secret strengths of the Finns, and reason they prevailed against all odds in WWII. If the Finns forget their God, and their pride in being Finnish, and allow others to dictate who gets in the country i.e. those with a different god, it will be their downfall. Cultures that forget their God, die, while those that remember their God survive and continue on, as history has shown. One way to destroy a culture is to get them to move away from their traditional religion and identity. This is slowly happening in Finland, and it should be stopped immediately. There are those in the elite, behind the scenes who set up EU, who are pushing for the downfall of Finland. Judging from the Finnish spirit at the Vancouver 2010 Olympics, Finland will have to take a few steps back to go forward. Undoing the damage may take a generation. The present struggle is not a physical one, but a spiritual one. This is what will happen.
Finland and The Finnish People
Finland (Suomi), a northern European country of 5.2 million people, is a land where peasants have always been free. Historically, Finns are stubbornly independent and hard-working.
Since 1155, Finland had been in the Swedish realm. Finland became the borderline between the Orthodox east and Western Christianity. Most Finns are Lutheran, which is basically Protestantism. Simply put, the Bible is the highest authority for Christians, and the worship of icons, saints and special intercession and interpretive powers for priests was discarded by Martin Luther. The "just shall live by faith" and belief in Jesus and God's grace is sufficient to be saved.
The dominance of Christian faith, and the attendant freedoms and prosperity it has created in Finland is now in question. (freedom)(Bilderberg Group) Worship of a pagan Arab ancient Moon-God is claimed to be the same as the Christian God. We should love all cultures and people, but we do not have to love all religions. For example, there are lots of people who simply hate Christianity. These same people are very tolerant toward Muslims, without apparent reason. Are the Finnish people willing to accept everything that comes with that political totalitarian ideology that they call a religion? If Nazism or Communism were a religion, and in a way they were, would they be permissible in Finland? Perhaps but they would not increase in numbers as will Muslims.
As a biologist, I understand the population bomb represented by Islamic immigration better than the average person, due to their explosive birth rates. If we do not accept these consequences, then we have to ask ourselves, why accept Islam, a totalitarian "religion" (largely a political movement with a religious face) that is planning to take the world by storm, and succeeding? There will be polygamy, Shariah Law and oppression and harm to women and more, in the name of Multiculturalism (See Failure of Multiculturalism) which is really a political system spreading over the globe. I think not, but they are not aware of the final result of their willingness to accept immigrants from Islamic countries. The government does not have a clear idea of the limits of accommodation of these people's religious beliefs, which are really weird and troublesome if you study it in depth. This must change. Finland continues to be split on Muslim immigration, the Liberals for it and the others, to varying degrees, against it. So what could the long term results be for Finland if say, there were a realistic number of 100,000 Muslims living there? (See Islamic Majority in Europe within 20 Years). Would they be Finns first and Muslims second? When push comes to shove, they are not, as the Qur'an says otherwise. Statistics say this would skyrocket to massive numbers quickly, and the central question is: would the Finnish people welcome it? Would they tolerate Islamic practices in their community, for example their treatment of women? This is the time to ponder these questions, not when there is a million Muslims in the country. We do not tolerate hate, but we do want to be realistic about who we let into our country. In this regard, multiculturalism, is a concept that has gained favor with the world in the name of diversity. However, do people really want "countries" along with their religions, within their country, where they are segregated into ghettos? We have seen this in numerous countries now and they seem to be happy, but are the locals really happy or just towing the politically correct line? Insanity in Europe
Can friendliness be a curse? Perhaps. Children are taught not to be too friendly with strangers. What about adults? Should they be friends with just "anybody?" Should a country be very selective about who it allows in? This page takes the position that yes, it is very important for the future of the country. When the leaders of a country try to silence free speech on this topic, they are guilty of a crime against the people and should be dealt with appropriately. Who is more important, the people who live in the country or people who want for whatever reason, to immigrate there? This is a difficult subject to place on a page such as this but it is necessary. We cannot be silent about what is being done to us! Check out what has happened to free speech in Europe.
The Finnish people (like most of us) are generally ignorant of what Islam is, even in the United States. They believed, as they had been told, that it is some kind of peaceful religion that is being persecuted by the Jews etc. who they should "protect." So they let them in, by the thousands - to the tune of 40,000. But how do you reverse something once you have started it? All they can do now is watch the population explosion, as the more children they have the more government benefits. For they have been tricked - it is not what they believe, and Finland may be in big trouble, if not now then in the next 10-20 years when their explosive population growth, and future intentions, become clear. The true colors of Islam (as stated in their religion, and practiced for over a thousand years) will be made known, but it will be too late. The problem probably will not come from the majority, but rather the religion will always be hijacked later by fanatics. It may not be too late now, if they act NOW. Most Nazis, Communist, Japanese, etc. were peaceful, but the fanatics were able to take over and kill millions of people. All the peace-loving people were made irrelevant by their silence. So it is with Islam, if you allow it to take root in your country, eventually the fanatics will take over and that will be the end. Peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by their silence. Peace-loving Muslims will become our enemy if they don't speak up, because like the Germans, they will awaken one day and find that the fanatics own them, and the end of their world will have begun. What are the Muslims in your community doing to fight fanaticism? Stop it now. How fanatics eventually take over. When people's eyes, ears and common sense have been compromised, this is what happens.
If you live in Finland, DO something for your country. Your fathers and grandfathers, like mine, gave you this country, and now it is your turn to keep it for your people, just as it is. Do not fall for the brainwashing that it is so beautiful to share the country and wealth, with others. Many of the people were bums in their country and they're bums in Finland. Many are asylum (free ride) seekers for life in their own countries is hard; soft is good. Islam's true colors: a ticking time bomb. There is a silver lining to this situation though. Many woman can be freed from the clutches of a system that uses them as baby making machines to overrun the world with Islam. Many are abusive relationships. Others are so restrictive of women that they are basically prisoners. In Finland they can find freedom and live as God intended - free just like men. Finland will be a fertile ground for this activity as they have a long history of emancipation of women.
Why isEurope being turned over to Islam. It is a religion that claims to be peaceful and tolerant but which fails on every claim, in practice and in doctrine. This is happening in Finland too, and all the "do gooders" are helping it. Forgive them for they know not what they do: destroying the culture.
Were we not all created equal, women and men? Of course, but Islam makes women sex objects, rape objects - who cannot refuse sex in a marriage. This is what they want instead of Christianity, which is benign, contrary to the propaganda of today. Further, they must cover their bodies at all times, preventing God's solar rays from doing His vital function: the production of Vitamin D from skin exposure to the sun. Only men are allowed Vitamin D production, which is even more important in the northern latitudes. Take it off, is the cry of Finns, heard from every sauna in the country. All the polls in Finland and most other countries clearly show that people do not want more immigrants in their country. Finns are starting to have enough of the nonsense that is going around Europe, and in fact the whole world. They do not want to become Multicultural, which is a failed concept everywhere it has been tried - leaving behind a country unrecognizable from the original. That is why you will find resistance in Finland, by the Finns to immigrants, and especially those from the Middle East and Pakistan and the Sudan area. You may disagree, but if you do, you are in the minority. It is one thing to push normal immigrants into a country, but quite another matter to push Muslims and criminals there. The crime rate has sky rocketed. Why would you think that Finns would want more? Why am I spending this time on this topic on a page about where Finland has been and where it is going? I am doing it to underline the extreme importance of this subject and we should all be activists against what is happening around the world, which is being pushed on us by a small group of elite that meet once a year to plan action. The British people don't want it, the Finnish people don't want it, Americans don't want it, but it is coming anyway. I say we do something instead of turning on the TV and becoming a zombie for the rest of the evening while our country goes to hell in a handbasket.
If you understand Islam, you will know what I mean, if not, then you will have to study the subject more. Everyone I have spoken to believes that Islam means "peace" as this is what the Muslims claim. But when you check, you find it means "submission." So they are lying, and they want in the country. The reason for pushing Islamic immigrants on Europe is unclear but the suspicion is that they are trying to ruin every country and push a New World Order on us. Islam is certainly capable of accomplishing their goal, and is the biggest threat to the future peace in Finland. Finns will fight rather than convert to the pagan religion, and therefore it will be a civil war as in 1918. The conciliatory behavior stops abruptly when Muslims get into a majority position after which the real Islam can be seen. All other religions will be abolished. This forecast is based on what has happened in other countries that allowed Islam to get a foothold, and can be easily confirmed. Some countries have seen and heeded the writing on the wall but others are still thinking about how beautiful it is to have a homogeneous world. Here is one country that will not budge to Islamic demands, (when demands are granted, it never ends) and that should be Finland's stance too. Australia denied Muslims any changes in its laws.
In 1808, Finland became a Russian autonomous Grand Duchy, a special status giving the Finns great control of their internal government. After the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917, Finland became an independent republic with a social democratic government. The Finnish Independence Day is December 6.
At 337,000 sq. km. (130,128.01 sq. mi.), with 60,000 lakes, Finland is about the size of New England, New Jersey, and New York combined, or 4/10 the size of British Columbia, Canada. Finland's southern shores are at the approximate latitude of Yukon/Northwest Territories/British Columbia border. Mapquest Stats summary with map
Finland can boast a little bit when confronted with one-up-manship of neighbors. Finland's education system is rated (2002, 2003) third best in the world, and in 2006 ranked the highest.
NEW YORK - No country has an economy more conducive to sustained growth than Finland, so says the World Economic Forum (WEF) in its Global Competitiveness Report. Forbes, 2004
Freedom of Press: which country is tops? You guessed it. Reporters Without Borders
These values and identity that built and sustained Finland should be preserved.
Sixty Minutes TV show reported that Finns are the shyest people on earth. I know this to be accurate to some extent having been born there, but they are making good progress.
I took a trip to the country where I was born before going to University, as a sort of "Rite of Passage." There I met the Finns themselves, who were not that shy once you got to know them. Shyness is a national character and does not necessarily mean they are depressed or antisocial. You must realize that Finns are originally a forest/river/lake people and as such are comfortable being alone in the vast wilderness of the north; living with crowds is alien to the Finnish spirit - the exception being (e.g. Tango) dance halls. The Show takes the extreme point of view, but here it is.
In 1939 and again in 1944, Finland was almost swallowed up by its giant communist neighbor, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics headed by the dictator Joseph Stalin. Although Finland managed to remain outside the Soviet Union, she lost most of the province of Karelia and about 450,000 people were relocated in Finland, which included the writer's parents and grandparents. European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE) is addressing the needs of people who were displaced in wartime. Central issue is the return of assets taken, especially real estate. Russians for some reason have always thought that Karelia was theirs, and Sweden had no rights there. How is it that they should have the right to take the land away from the Finns? Neither Sweden nor Russia has the right to occupy Karelia, which was already occupied, though relatively sparsely, by Finns. Some sources say Karelia was inhabited by Finno-Ugric tribes, but this is misleading. They were just a branch of Baltic Finns, who should have been a part of Finland, not Russia.Their history speaks of Sweden coming to take "their" land! The Finns are spoken of as merely "settlers" ignoring the fact that they are the rightful owners of the land they craved so much. Who owns Karelia?
Did the Finnish tribes change the Russian place names to Finnish, or did the invading Russians change the Finnish names to Russian? Who named the geographical areas are the owners. Check the map section and see how far East from the present border the Finnish names for every stream, lake, and other topology, went. You see, the argument between the Finns and Russians was over land. The Swedes backed the Finns and the Russians tried divide and conquer to get the Eastern Finnic people to fight their relatives to the West. The Swedes did not turn the Finns into Swedes over the 700 years they controlled the territory, but the Russians did everything they could to prevent the Eastern Karelians from joining their brothers to the West. Religion played a big role there. They (Russians) had lots of land, there was no valid reason for them to annex the land of Finns and Karelians who are basically Finns. They began a divide and conquer policy, and wiped out many small Finnish communities early in the first millennium. And so, we come to 1944, when Russia annexed much of Karelia. This attitude was pervasive in Russia; they felt they owned the world, and took the lands of smaller tribes everywhere as if they were entitled to it, like true colonists that they are. In Karelia their action was one of genocide, and just as illegal as their first entry into Karelia in 12th Centry.
It will be interesting to see how willing Putin et al is in returning booty USSR took illegally. (Russia signed the Atlantic Charter) Since Karelia was a part of USSR which no longer exists, Russia has actually annexed Karelia after the fall of Communism. Karelia should have gone back to Finland at that time. Return Karelia
Finland (like many other European States, e.g. Poland and Baltic States) failed to obtain assistance from United States and Britain in the WWII. The "Third Aggressor of WWII" received assistance "to beat Hitler" but this aid was used to annex millions of square Kilometers of land to the Soviet Union.
It may sound silly but, nowadays Russia still actually claims that tiny Finland attacked the giant Soviet Union and that they were fighting Fascism. Even Churchill pointed to Finland's "Fascist" leanings, though all Finland wanted was Karelia back where it belongs. Perhaps by the same logic, England had Communist leanings since they were friends of Stalin. A mouse does not normally attack an elephant, but that Finnish mouse did roar when attacked. Finland was never, and never will be Fascist - it is against the Finnish nature which accepts everyone, while one of the main goals of Fascism is to cull away all undesirables of the face of the earth. Finland was, in fact, fighting its age-old war: trying to prevent Russians from annexing/occupying/absorbing, Russifying and finally enslaving the people. From the Baltic to the Pacific, if the Slavs had to give up all the land they stole, they would have nowhere to go. Yet, they claim old Finnish cities such as Viipuri as "Old Russian" city they liberated from the Finnish thieves. Russian history books are great fiction, but when repeated in the West, their "history" becomes a serious thing the Finns have been trying to correct.
Accusing the other side of aggression is merely a normal war formality. The Finns did not have a death wish. The old sport of "the Russians crossing the Finnish Line" (where they often got Finnished) goes back hundreds of years, but Churchill and Roosevelt chose to ignore that fact in 1941-44, an about face from 1939, when Russia tried to annex little Finland. That the war was not just is refuted or accepted by Russian leadership depending on who is in power. The present administration claims Finland attacked, which was the Soviet position. Russia downplays the first 1939-40 Winter War (which is easily seen as Russian aggression) but emphasizes Finland's 1941 offensive to take back the lost territory with German aid. Hence Soviets claim that the land they took in 1944 was liberated from the fascists, (therefore morally right) though Finland is and has always been, a Social Democratic country - and fiercely independent. The counter culture of 1970's called stealing "liberating" - which is what the Russians still call it today. The indigity done not just to the Finns, but the other Baltic countries as well, by the Soviets - and picked up by and repeated by the Western press - is that anyone fighting with the Nazis against Soviets, were Nazis themselves. This lie cast a shadow over the Finns and helped the Soviets annex Karelia in front of the noses of Churchill and Roosevelt, and with their blessings. They hoped that by giving Stalin what he wanted, he would cooperate with them later. But fighting with the Nazis, or being occupied by them was of little consequence, for the results would be the same: annexation, enslavement and forced deportation and/or death. The use of the word "Nazi" by the Russian people, even today often extends to anyone opposed to Russian influence. Russian propaganda only focuses on the millions of people the Nazis murdered, but seldom do they recall for the people the millions of people Stalin, one of their own, murdered.
The world has a right to be concerned today about the direction Russia is headed under Putin et al. Russia has become a tyranny of the majority, with much Nazi-like behavior like German brown shirts of the 30's, and even the news is under government control. Putin stages rallies to stay in power Perhaps there is more Fascism and Communism still in the world than we would like to admit, both sides of the Atlantic. Which one is worse is anyone's guess as both want total control over the people's wishes.
Putin has also reinstated the alliance between the Russian Orthodox Church and Government - as in the days of the Czars. The Church supported Putin and in return, Putin agreed to begin persecution of all other religions, as in the old times. How can the Russian Orthodox Church be the true church if it is supporting persecution of other Christians? One religion, one party, what's next? The door has all but closed for evangelism, and gathering in homes to exercise religious liberty is now a crime. What makes the west so strong and free, is their willingness to accept various religious beliefs, allowing them to freely exercise worship. Alexandr Solzhnitsyn believed that the problems of the world were spiritual, not political. He believed that what Russia needed to do more than anything else was to repent for the suffering she had caused. In 1983, when he was awarded the prestigious Templeton Prize, in his acceptance speech, he said that if he had to sum up the World’s problems in a few words he would say “Men have forgotten God”. I couldn't agree more.
Finnish Society underwent a profound transition in the last part of the second millennium, and continues in the new one. On the 1st of January 1995, Finland joined the European Union (EU, former EEC or EC), losing a lot of her autonomy in the process. Finland is participating in the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU); the currency (markka, abbr. mk or FIM) is now replaced by Euro (with a ratio of 5.94571 FIM = 1 euro). (There are so many songs in Finland with Markka in it. Will they have to change the words? "Ei ole mulla Euroja taskussa..." = I don't have any Markkas in my pocket..) In February 2000, Tarja Halonen became the first woman president of Finland. She is active in charting a "humane" (if that is possible!) path for globalization, women's rights and human rights. The goals and values inherent in Globalization are not the values that built Finland, or any other country. It is a big threat to the Finnish identity. She, and her predecessor, do not oppose massive Muslim immigration that the elite circles are forcing on Europe and this is her worse characteristic as it will destroy the country. She has stated that "a few" immigrants can't possibly hurt despite the fact that the kind of immigration is obviously bad for the country. The Finnish people speak with their hiring practices, and the unemployment rate for immigrants is almost 30%. This does not mean that Finns are xenophobic, but it does mean that they are not being consulted about who the government lets into the country. Obviously they do not approve.
Further, what is humane about closing down factories in Globalization and sending the work to some foreign country, which is a symptom and result of these policies? Tolerance is good, but only of those things that benefit the country, not ones that damage it. Human Rights Inquisition by EU As there is proof of damage from Sweden, England and France and other countries, the Finns should take the subject seriously and do what has to be done. Much of the negative news is filtered by the media. (It happened in France, now Finland) United States, led by Senator Ted Kennedy took the first steps (1965) in changing Christian immigration to Muslim, and now dozens of countries have also changed their immigration policies. It is all about dilution, of Christian dominated countries. It is a real threat, that most people do not even realize - a threat to the culture and religion - to bring about the New World Order, the evil system that will dominate us all. They think it is nice to share the wealth, and to love other cultures. But that is not the intent of those behind it. Now Obama has taken it a step further. Most people do not believe it because Ted is supposed to be a good Catholic. It is hard not to suppose that there is some kind of international movement by some group, as we have witnessed this phenomenon in all of Europe as well. What is humane about wanting to bring in one world government and surrendering all your power to some other country or group of people, so that your people cannot undo any stupidity perpetrated on them? The people of Finland have always been free. Are the people of Finland free today? Are they sheep being lead to the slaughter? Time will tell but they are less free every day.
Tarja is a walking contradiction, for her values are at odds with Finnish tradition. She is a pacifist yet the head of Finland's armed forces. She is head of the Church of Finland, yet doesn't go to church, being a secular humanist, socialist and globalist. She would rather attend a Leftist gathering than one honoring those who fell fighting for Finland's independence (against Leftists). She has achieved nothing worth mentioning with Russia. But she is a woman, and women vote for women. Globalism, defined as increased movement of money, culture (people) and commerce, is already making a significant impact in Finland. Globalism, to the writer means making collectives in global regions, controlling their internal affairs, and finally uniting them into One World Government. And we have been warned about what that means; there are many theories how it will all play out in the end, and we should probably be cautious about supporting its ultimate aims. In fact, there is a world-wide backlash to thwart these goals that will only benefit the elite and take away what rightfully belongs to the people. Further, among their goals is to destabilize countries by taking away their natural desire to defend what is rightfully THEIRS ALONE: the sovereign right to determine their own internal affairs, especially with regards to forced immigration, and what they call "human rights" but which is only designed to destroy local cultures, religions and nationalistic feelings. And one major associated problem is control of food production, which should be ONLY in the sole control of the people. This is slowly disappearing and outsiders are beginning to dictate how farmers can grow food - an extremely worrisome thing because people want food without poisons - while globalist controls favor methods that their scientists say are safe, but which are definitely anything but.
President Halonen supports Turkey's bid to join EU, and has not recognized the Armenian Genocide by Turkey. This is just political correctness played with over a million innocent Christians massacred by Turks. She wouldn't mind if a few million Finnish Lutherans would go away. Nothing much has changed there. Turkey is outwardly a "democratic" free country but inwardly a repressive typical Islamic regime, though somewhat less than other countries in the region. The question of Islamic violence is a no-brainer: this so-called "peaceful religion" exterminated Christians and Jews off the face of the Arabian peninsula, over a thousand years ago. With this evidence in hand, they still claim that all those people volunteered to become Muslims, and no infidels were killed unless they were "fighting Allah." Well what do you know? "Fighting Allah" just means you don't want to become Muslim. So that tells you what will happen when their numbers grow and they become stronger, in any country! We need to wake up, and play it safe. What does that tell you. If you said, they've been lying to us, you are right. This is the true Islamic tolerance, recorded into history forever: it is non-existent, a fantasy, unbelievable stupid wishful thinking on the part of everything west of Russia. Countries recognizing the Armenian Genocide.
Turkey wants to project an image satisfactory to the people of EU, but it is (in the opinion of the writer) a dishonest image. Their Constitution guarantees "Freedom of Religion," but in practice it represses all religions but Islam. Atom Egoyan's film Ararat is about the Armenian Genocide by Turkey. (see DVD in left column) In 2007, United States Senate has proclaimed the killing of at least one million Arminian Christians in Turkey as genocide, a charge they deny. Turkey was the country that was trying to take over Europe in the Middle Ages. Now are Europeans thinking of inviting them to take over? What stupidity is driving this? Perhaps EU members should think again when dealing with Turkey. A Muslim country will never be a truly open, or free, society although each one claims to be just that. If the Muslim holy books were not of a "respected" religion, they would be banned due to the violent example given to the followers by Muhammad himself, a warrior chief who told his followers that dying for Islam is the greatest virtue in a Muslim. If they aren't fighting Jews, they are fighting each other; it is the fault of their religion and they know it in their heart of hearts. So what do you expect every young Muslim wants then? Constant warfare. And, as Finland has accepted these people into the country in large numbers, one more horror is waiting for the people of Finland: the birth rate of Muslims is many times that of Finns themselves. In a small country of barely over 5 Million, this will prove to be something that Finns never anticipated, as their power will continue to grow, and the power of Finns themselves will continue to fall correspondingly. Eventually they will take over if you take it to the logical conclusion. The freedom Finns fought for so long, will be gone. What intelligent, thinking person can continue to listen to the lies of our heads of state about how peaceful Islam is? The other question is, what is the reason they are lying? What is their Heaven 1?....2?
Want to get educated about Islam. Rober Morey is an expert to the FBI, teaching them about the real Islam. For those who are tired of the same old lies, listen to these two Real Audio files.
No country in EU represses religion, but this will change if Turkey joins. Christians who preach in Turkey are typically arrested and jailed for two years and released just before the trial. That's not all, Turkey is increasingly being ruled by the Muslim leaders, as in Iran and Iraq. Most Christians have left. How is this country able to fit into a European "free" society? It is impossible. Finnish president Halonen would welcome Turkey into EU, despite gross human rights violations, showing that Liberal minded thinkers are willing to accept anything, even if it is not in the interest of the country. If you are a Christian living in Europe and you want to start a church in Turkey, you will be jailed. (Southwest Radio Church) Christians in Cypress have their properties taken away. Cypress Russia (Russian Orthodox) and Islamic countries do not tolerate other religions. How can any such religion claim to be peaceful and loving and tolerant? Their religion (Russian Orthodox and Islam) is about power and persecution of other religions. Can any such religion be tolerated by freedom loving people? Of course not, if you have half a brain. How Islam, the "peaceful religion" treats women.
Which path has Finland chosen to set for itself? The new millennium has brought many potential traps to which unwary nations could easily become prey. By joining EU, it has set its path with the collective, which means much less control of ones own destiny. The folly of EU becomes the folly of Finland. The successes of EU become the successes of Finland, at least in theory.
Many Finns are just beginning to find out exactly what it means to be in this union, and some are having second thoughts about losing their hard fought for and won, independence. Once again, Finland and the Finnish language is in a minority position in a larger union. The Finns are generally very enthusiastic about this relationship, but not all news is positive about the EU affects on the Finnish people, especially farmers. There is also a lesson from the past. In the late 1600's when Finnish troops were fighting Sweden's battles, far away from their land, Finland was attacked by Russians, which ended up being a massive setback for all Baltic Finns. Could this be repeated if war breaks out and Finnish troops have to go defend Central Europe, leaving Finland vulnerable?
The future of Finnish culture and language is daily becoming increasingly fragile. Not only is Finland engulfed in EU, a massive surrender of sovereignty, but the people embrace western culture to a great extent, and in their enthusiasm to do so, have suffered linguistic and cultural decrement recently to powerful, magnetic Americanism that is readily available through all media sources. There are many ways Finns could suffer greatly in this union. If EU accepts Codex Alimentarius, for example, Finland may have to also accept it, creating a health disaster.
The Finnish language is unique, musical and beautiful and should always be appreciated or it may, in the near future, be lost. The Finnish vocabulary, being agglutinative, is self-defining, and offers unlimited combinations to form meanings. "Keuhkoputkentulehdus" is formed from three words: keuhko, (lung) putki, (tube) and tulehdus (inflammation). The definition is contained in the word itself. English words, by contrast, can only achieve a few forms and meanings, and you have to remember the definition. But Finnish has already been radically adultrated by English words, and that's a "fakta" - and they listen to their favorite music "biisi" piece. The Finnish "kappale" and "pala" no longer work to discribe music. The average Finn spends 3 hours per day watching television. No wonder they are picking up these words so quickly. Perhaps there are some changes to be made... The January 2003 programming for TV2: 9 American films, 4 Finnish films and 3 other. Finland faces West, even past its EU brothers.
Finland has a national knack for mobile communications and information technology and a vision for combining the two. Finland has the world's highest per capita cellular phone and Internet users. In fact, as of January 1999, there were more cellular phones in Finland than regular, and Nokia is now the largest cellular communications company in the world. I hope Nokia invents a safer cellular phone that won't fry the brain with microwaves.
They even use telecommunications to do access services such as washing cars.
Finland : A Rising Nationality, by Peter Kropotkin - 1885 observations about Finland and Finnish people. "Never having been a personal serf, he is not servile; he always maintains his personal dignity and speaks with the same grave intonation and self-respect to a Russian Tsar as to his neighbour. A lymphatic temperament, slowness of movement and of thought, and sullen indifference have often been imputed to him."
Alexis Kivi was a very important writer at a time when Finland was beginning to assert its own nationhood after seven hundred years in the Swedish realm and a hundred years associated with Russia. His most famous book is Seven Brothers. Story From Seven Brothers (in a sauna) by Alexis Kivi
Encyclopaedia Britannica Book of the Year 1945, 1946
Various Finnish History sites on the Internet
Estonian Institute
Copyright 1998 - 2010 Osmo Joronen
Uralica Northern Lights Center
Find your favorite books CD's, Videos and more here.
The Company
Amazon.com has received a great deal of very positive press coverage which has helped to make the Amazon.com brand name one of the more well-known among Internet sites. With gas prices and global warming, help yourself and the earth we share, shop here. Uralica has been associated with Amazon.com since 1998.
The Products/Services
You get a huge selection of books, CD's, videos, electronics and gifts at discount prices. Most items have reviews and excerpts or sound clips so you will know exactly what to expect, a benefit that you will find extremely useful. You also get a secure, convenient way to order and fast delivery. Type in your search or browse in one of the shops below.
Are you concerned about your loss of freedoms? Who is behind these vaccinations, and could you be forced to accept them? Forced Vaccinations in your future.
Finland and The Finnish People
Osmo