Mission: To go bravely where few have gone before, to expose strange new diseases and
useless research and cures, medical frauds, such as the $9 Billion per year AIDS research
program and the cancer research scam, and offer common sense alternatives. (What, no cure
and all that money? Oh, but this is a tough one, right? All scientists look to the
scientist to their right and nod and then left, and nod and say together: "Right!
This is a tough one!" Repeat several times. Like a bunch of little munchkins.) ...To
let the people know the truth, that the value of life now is measured in dollars, and if
you follow the money trail, it will take you to an army of highly paid experts (or should
we say munchkins). This page will show which methods exactly are more likely to have the high set of moral and ethical values: the alternative, natural medicines, such as Lapacho=Taheebo=Pau D'Arco tea, or the "researched" drugs which doctors are bribed to dispense and politicians are bribed to protect. This is done to discourage the afflicted from getting trapped into and becoming part of this scam and losing their lives in the process.
Further, this whole process is being accelerated by the drive towards globalization where profits
are put ahead of humans. The multinationals (and often the military) had a great idea:
let's use people as guinea pigs. As you know, the larger the test sample, the better. The
large drug companies are entrusted with dispensing harmless drugs, but they have been
guilty in the past of tampering with supplies, or putting drugs they know to be dangerous
on the market, in order to benefit themselves. And this is what the drug companies
want if we will sit back and do nothing. They will see how much the public can take and
keep pushing until something stops them. And governments are going along with it.
The attitude is that we don't have to properly test drugs because we can take care of any
problems later when we discover the disaster they caused. And industry will be only too
happy to cooperate then with more drugs. So you see, we have drawn a line in the sand with
governments and big business, together with bribed doctors and researchers, on one side and the people on the other. This is not to say
that profit is bad, but profit should not be the top consideration.
The Canadian government recently tried to push an antibiotic drug through the system for
approval, (no need to test it because it has been already in the United States) but one
person, an employee, made a big fuss to try and prevent it from being used in Canada. He
succeeded to some extent at great personal risk and it turned out he was right to
question, and the drug was pulled in the U.S. - after the damage had been done. Remember
that antibiotics, whether animal or human, are the drugs that create super bugs and we
cannot allow that.
Wasn't it the British Government that allowed cows to be fed back to cows which are
absolute vegetarians, causing Mad Cow Disease? Yes, that brought it to our attention, but many countries including USA and Canada were doing the same thing until the Brits blew the lid off the practice. Factory farms feed by-pass protein
supplements to cows, which is often animal protein, even dead cows which should not be used for anything. Animal products, possibly bovine sources, can also be found in the most unsuspecting products such as some sugar (purified through animal bone char), gelatin products etc. So you may be getting it from sources you least suspect.
Why would the British
government allow such a practice which is a danger to everyone's health? And then there
were the chemical and biological British tests performed on the population. The US government is no better. So to say that the government is your special friend is an exaggeration when it comes to your health and safety. They
basically back the drug companies, not you.
Mad Cow Disease may be here - Province, June 3, 2001
The Vancouver Province reported that "Health Canada warns humans and animals may be
quietly incubating deadly plague." If they say "may be" it means they
"are." Province, May 21, 2003, reported "shockwaves over Mad Cow disease." Canadian beef exports were banned to ease fears over the safety of food supplies. The article stated that it is safe to eat meat and it is extremely low risk. The diseased animal is supposed to be "the only one." The truth is that we don't know how many are out there because not all animals are tested and it takes a long time to develop symptoms. The news media spreads the news that the disease is only in the central nervous system, and you are safe if you don't eat brains. Well, this gives you a false sense of security because the very saw that bisects the cow's CNS also infects the products it touches. It is impossible to sterilize with normal methods (autoclave) whatever becomes contaminated. As an update to the above, in 2003 a United States Mad Cow was traced to Alberta. The question everyone is asking is, how many more are there that went undetected, because not all cows are tested. I have even heard it said that infected cows are not dangerous if the diseased parts are not used. These people are simply misinformed, and if you cut a mad cow in half and then go ahead and use the same equipment on a hundred or more other cows, this meat could be infected.
Some people think it is a sin to eat meat. It is not. But, there is a good reason some SDA members live several years longer than those of any other Christian denomination. However, if your faith is weak in meat, you should not eat it, and the Bible says nobody is to condemn you for it. Every time I see an animal, I connect with it in some way, and there is no way I could kill or even eat it. I found myself eating less of my animal friends every day until I became virtually vegetarian. I'd rather play with them, not kill them. The biologist in me I guess. So, my faith in meat today is weak; I avoid it. If your faith in it is better than mine, you will probably eat it. Therefore, there are only common sense reasons to avoid meat.
Ex-cattle rancher Howard Lyman believes that Mad Cow Disease is in America, and Canada, so
it is no surprise that Ottawa now reports its existence. Today many cattle ranchers do not
eat meat, like Mr. Lyman. The government says BSE (Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy)
"could be" quietly incubating among cattle and unsuspecting humans as nvCJD (new
variant Creutzfeldt-Jacobs Disease). This is not a strong enough statement. It all boils
down to risk-benefit analysis, which causes the government to down-play the risk, knowing
they don't have to worry about its effects, which could take 10 years or more to develop
into symptoms similar to Alzheimer's Disease and nobody will touch such a brain to see if
it was CJD. They can never clean their equipment or their premises - that is how
infectious it is. Once a blade, including a band saw at the slaughter house, has touched
an infected brain, and saws cut through the brain, it is permanently infected, and
continues to infect all meat passing that point. The whole plant should be shut down
because you can't disinfect it. Time to start eating veggie burgers. Hamburgers are often
made of 100 cows, any one of which could be infected thus passing on the CJD prion to
every piece of meat in the house, and eventually you the consumer. You and millions of
others will be incubating CJD, for which there is no cure. Also there are many products
out there made from bovine sources including capsules. All are potentially sources of Mad
Cow Disease. Try to avoid them at all cost. If you are raising beef cattle, check the feed
bag to ensure it does not contain animal protein. If it says protein is added, there is a
good chance it is bovine source. Dog and cat food also may contain remains of dead animals
such as cows, cats and dogs. Feed your pets vegan diets, but add torine to the cat's diet.
Note: the author of this page is not an MD. To have common sense,
you don't have to be. He is a biologist, and all opinions are based on that background.
But also, the writer's Finnish/Karelian father was a trained and gifted practitioner of,
among other things, some ancient arts of acupressure, which helped thousands of doctors'
rejects. He was an expert in referred pain, and had developed his own theory. He related
that his patients called him "doctor" instead of Andy, which he preferred. When
some refused to call him by name, he would politely say "My name is Andy" - to
which they would reply "yes doctor." One of the most amazing cases I recall was
a girl with a particular type of epilepsy. The mother had heard of my father's work and
asked him if he could cure epilepsy. My father said he didn't know because he had never
tried. A cranial examination revealed lesions at certain places where calcium had
deposited. He gently worked those areas with his amazing hands, and the patient passed
out. The mother said not to worry because it had happened before. The treatments continued
and the girl was cured. All of dad's patients were ordered to do salt baths regularly, using 1/4 bag of coarse salt. Also, dad used some old tested cures. I have seen dad cure his kidney stones by drinking copious quantities of lemonade, minus the sugar, and pass the stones in his urine. To stabilize pH he also used apple cider vinegar and was very conscious of the need to control acid conditions. In another case of a young person, too weak to board the school bus, dad prescribed Cod Liver Oil mixed in orange juice. The results were remarkable. The boy, who was assisted aboard the bus every morning, soon walked up on his own. He explained that the liver is like an animal, in order to get the Cod Liver Oil past the hungry liver, it had to be mixed with orange juice. Increase in elimination and control of body acidity were some of his methods to normalize the body's internal chemistry. So that is why the limitations of standard medicine is well
understood and why I have a unique perspective on alternative medicine. Many of the
promising alternatives were killed as infant protocols at various stages of development
by men who grew to be some of the richest men in the world. Often we hear medical
"authorities" on the radio or TV saying that if such and such were proven, they
would be selling or promoting it. Mostly, they are speaking from the perspective of their
medical training which knows nothing of these methods, because they are developing in the
grass roots, or are imported.
The concern is this: increase in drug-resistant bugs, increasing epidemics, pandemics and
high cost of medical care, drugs and the fact that cheaper efficacious treatments are
often blocked by powerful conflicting interests. Preventive medicine such as the ten
natural laws of health as explained by Dr. Lorraine Day, and natural cancer remedies such as Lapacho tea, could help to maintain a healthy
population for a fraction of current "drugs/operation" costs. How many times has your doctor tried to educate you on how to avoid getting sick? Would he or she rather fix
what's wrong after you're sick? That is how they are taught in medical school. Prevention would keep the population healthy with the burden lifted from medical care system, which is breaking down everywhere. If you are a doctor, or medical practitioner, please look into prevention and natural alternatives. Remember, you can't really heal the patient unless you reverse the cause.
Dr. Lorraine Day - Madame Doctor/Whistle Blower
I have added this section after viewing Dr. Day's video. She is the medical profession's
loudest whistle-blower I have ever witnessed, and whose views you should study in depth if
you wish to understand, not only how to get well, but the whole Pharmaceutical/Medical
systems under which we all live or die.
In Dr. Day's video "Cancer Doesn't Scare Me Anymore" she explains how the system
works. American Medical Association, one of America's strongest unions, works for the
benefit of, not the people, but doctors. They lobby for their best interests, not yours.
American Cancer Society is no better: just get a check-up and give us a check. The
$400,000,000 collected from the people annually goes not to medical research, but mostly
to keeping the huge organization's employees on the payroll. A fraction goes to
prevention, showing where their priorities are. And when they do make a statement, such as
about eating vegetables, it only reiterates what the alternative medicine people have said
all along. I'll bet you thought it went to research. Only a small amount of it does.
National Cancer Institute: they are supposed to be involved in cancer research, but we get
nothing but the old cutting, burning and poisoning. When they make any statement, it
usually just says what we've said all along, that, for example, carrots (my Holland Lop is
right) can prevent cancer. They don't mention that they play any part in a potential cure
They wanted to do a mastectomy on Dr. Day, but she refused. She did let them cut out the
lump and whatever they could get. Critics use this against her, saying surgery cured her.
But the cancer was proven to have spread out all over her body. Another doctor who refused
chemo and radiation.
Nothing changes, there is no "magic bullet." If they do radiation, they could
destroy your insides, and often it may only increase your chances of survival by perhaps
5%. What's the good of that? Did you know that if they found an inexpensive cancer cure
tomorrow, all of the above would have to pack up and close shop. So why would they do
that? Why would they want to lose their jobs? The answer is, they are scared of losing
their jobs to some natural, inexpensive cure. They protect themselves by attacking those
who cure cancer with natural cures, or lie about test results as in the case of Laetrile.
The news media picked up only "the results were negative" while the fellow who
did the tests, was trying to get his word in. The results were in fact positive.
Pharmaceutical companies control the media. They either own them or are major advertisers.
So you never hear about these cures, or if you do it is in the negative. We only know
these facts from defectors from this unholy system, like Dr. Lorraine Day and others.
For those who don't know, Dr. Lorraine Day faced cancer of the breast, which had spread
throughout her lymphatic system and muscles of her chest. As a leading surgeon, she knew
what they did to people with cancer and she refused to go along, even when the cancer
doctor refused to treat her unless she complied with either 1)mastectomy 2)radiation or
3)chemotherapy. She asked the doctor: my immune system is the most important factor in my
fight against cancer. Why should I let you destroy it?
In the British Medical Journal Lancet, 1975, a report compared the survival rates of:
What do you think had the best chance for survival and quality of remaining life? No chemo
of course. Dr. Allen Levin states: "Most cancer patients die of the chemo."
The American Cancer Society charter says they must disband when they find a cure. This
means there is a negative incentive to find a cure, which explains why one has not been
With so much opposition, how has alternative medicine made any headway at all? It is often
through congressmen who have been cured by these alternative means. Take ex-congressman
Berkley Bedell. Cedar Rapids Gazette, Iowa: Congressman Bedell "blasts medical
establishment, credits alternative medicine for his cure from prostate cancer and Lyme
disease." He warns there are powerful forces in the government and corporate medical
monopolies that are making unconventional medicine inaccessible to the general public.
Bedell, a member of the ad hoc advisory committee to the new Federal Office for
Alternative Medicine also called for the dismissal of Joseph Jacobs, who is the director
of the Office for Alternative Medicine, citing his lack of commitment needed to challenge
these powerful forces in the National Institute of Health, the National Cancer Institute
and others that oppose alternative medicine. See Chemotherapy
(October 18, 2002 - Discussion of "Cancer Doesn't Scare Me Anymore" by
Dr. Lorraine Day to be updated as time permits - please check back)
DANGER: BAD DRUGS
Child, Husband, Wife Killers
The "antidepressant Drugs: Prozac, Zoloft, Paxil belong to a group of drugs called
selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Dr. Anne Blake-Tracy has done a lot of
research on the effects of antidepressants. Not everyone has a toxic reaction to these
drugs, but a significant number of people do, perhaps 10% of the population. Their livers
are not able to metabolize these drugs. The results are often disastrous. This is Dr.
Tracy's warning to the world. It is best to stay away from them, but most doctors do not
know about the dangers because the drug companies are so good at keeping it secret. The
drug companies usually settle out of court and place a gag order on the survivors.
Typically, it begins when someone visits their trusted doctor as in the case of this one
woman in question. The doctor says, "gee, why don't you try some Zoloft." Six
weeks later the patient and her son are dead. In three weeks, she started to have some
serious adverse reactions to the drug, so he cut her dosage in half. Of course that wasn't
enough. She was having a compulsion for alcohol that often comes with these drugs. If you
have a tendency to low blood sugar, you have a craving, not only for sweets, but also
alcohol. Then you have a magnification effect by using those two together.
If the drug is not having the desired effect (the patient gets worse), the doctor then
increases the dose in many cases, doubling or tripling the dose and the danger. This was the case in the Yates murder trial: she could not metabolize the drugs which were given to her double dose - so she had a psychotic break which is so familiar with this group of drugs. In one
such case, a police officer's dose was tripled. Two weeks later, he ran into a police
sub-station in plain clothes, shooting. He did not come out alive. That case has been
settled by the drug company. They paid off the family of the police officer and the
officer he shot. In the end it is the "insanity" that gets the blame, and like Yates, they are locked up and given more of these drugs they can't metabolize and they live out the rest of their lieves in hell. Getting off these drugs is often the first step to recovery.
These drugs do the same thing to the brain as LSD and PCP, which cause psychotic breaks
with reality. All of these drugs, regardless of their chemistry, do the same thing: they
cause a dangerous increase in brain Serotonin.
The drug's description: "Fluoxetine (Prozac family of drugs) is extensively
metabolized by the liver to norfluoxetine." This is not always so. It has been
estimated that perhaps 90% of mothers that murdered their children, who initially only had
a minor problem, were on a Prozac family of drugs. They often act out their worst fears.
If that fear is that something terrible will happen to their children, their children
could end up dead, like in the Yates case. (She has been railroaded into a life inside an insane asylum! It was the fault of the drug, in my opinion.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration defines rare as occurring in less than one in 1,000 people. (The drug company's expert witness at Yates' trial testified that reactions to the drug is rare. Other experts such as Dr. Ann Blake Tracy say one in ten cannot metabolize these powerful drugs and their condition gets worse.) In the U.S. alone, about 19.2 million prescriptions for Effexor were filled last year. If my math is correct, they feel that exposing 19,200 people to a possible psychotic break that might end in suicide or murder, is OK. When Yates was found not guilt by insanity, TV and radio had a field day with that. They were trying to decide what would be a suitable punishment for her. My question is: what is a suitable punishment for the drug company that caused the whole thing?
A lot of money is being made from the misery of innocent people.
Because of these and other serious drawbacks to these drugs, they should be outlawed right
along with LSD, PCP and the rest of these dangerous drugs. The doctors who give these drugs to patients don't even check to see what the causes are. What's the cure for dehydration or poor nutrition, Prozac? It could actually be something as simple as low blood sugar or dehydration. (Dr. L. Day) But a doctor who is busy labelling the "disease" may prescribe some drug that matches the diagnosis, one that has dangerous side effects.
(June 15, 2002 - Discussion of Anne Blake-Tracy to be updated as time permits - please check back)
When choosing your medicine and listening to "experts" you should be cautious
and know as much or more about various treatment options than your doctor; your life could
depend on it. Use anecdotal information about treatments the same way you would anecdotal
information about a good doctor, or dentist. You can't necessarily scientifically prove
(and you may be dead before such proof) they are good doctors, but word of mouth evidence
is powerful. If doctors got paid for actually curing a person, I bet they would change.
Doctors simply do not want to stray into doing something
the herd of doctors don't do.
Bottom Line: cheaper, safer, more effective therapies are out
there - leave your "
holistic - example " options open. Consult your doctor, work with him if
possible. Your birthright is to know what is out there. A billion dollars a day around the
world is spent on cancer alone. Cancer still has not been cured. Figure it out, what do
you think drives this whole business? Putting profits first (and I believe in free
enterprise, but not at the cost of lives) is the greatest crime against humanity, and it
was started by the Rockefeller Foundation, which funds only medical research that pays
back, such as drugs, and blocks other protocols. What chances do cheaper and better
medicines have of getting grants with people like that on University boards? With regards
to electrical stimulation, the Rockefeller/Flexner Report of 1910 attempted to discredit
electromedicine in order to increase pharmaceutical profits, and many other protocols got
similar treatment. Pharmaceuticals' appeal is in that a diagnosis can be easily paired
with a drug, with "known" results and there is a feeling that all diseases can
be cured if we only had the right drug. Alternatives probably mean sending a patient to a
practitioner, many of whom are not recognized, or medical insurance does not cover - a
little more complicated. Here are Dr. Day's 10 Steps to healing from Cancer or any other
Dr Lorraine Day's 10 steps to Wellness - 10 Natural Laws
1. Proper Nutrition - 30% of all cancer could be prevented
through good diet, preferably Vegan. Fruits, grains, vegetables - 3 servings fresh,
unprocessed, organic + 8 carrot juices (add apple for flavor) throughout day - in between
meals - get a juicer that presses the juice out. Herbal teas like taheebo or essiac. Not
too much protein. Try sprouting and eating more raw. Cooking food kills enzymes. No genetically modified products - that global companies are pushing on us!
2. Exercise - 4 hours per week - reduces 66% incidence rate for breast cancer.
3. Water - We are 75% water - dehydration, major cause of disease. Water is best
detoxifier. Use chlorine-free water only.
4. Sunlight - boosts immune system, reduces size of tumors, not too much though.
5. Temperance - elimination of all harmful chemicals - carcinogens, gum food, processed
foods, drugs, all medications but not instantly, gradually - step by step
6. Fresh Air. Indoor air doubles cancer growth speed. Hospital air not good - full of
germs, little if any fresh air. Cancer doesn't like oxygen. Do deep breathing exercises
7. Proper sleep. By 9:30 p.m. at least. Body needs to recuperate
8. Stress Relief, stress major cause of disease, read the Bible. God promises to heal all
your diseases if you keep His commandments.
What you put in your mind is as important as your food.
Every negative thought must go.
9. Attitude of gratitude - learn to Trust in God. You need to change everything, need
faith in God. Sickness does not glorify God. He wants you well.
A person who is enthusiastic and committed to a recovery program is much more likely to
10. Have a Spirit of benevolence - don't focus on self too much, pray for others.
All 10 steps are free, except food which we need anyway.
Drugs never cure disease - we do, (With God's help) cancer is not chemo deficiency. Dr.
Day believes that to be cured we must reverse the cause. We cannot cure a disease by doing
something completely unrelated to the cause.
Modern medicine does not use science correctly. If they did, they would set up the problem differently. Independent variables and dependent variables are the stuff of true science. Independent variables cause changes in the dependent variable. By manipulating the independent variable, we can determine the cause of the phenomenon, the dependent variable. We can't cheat and force changes in the dependent variable, but this is what medical science does. Because they cheat, the cause may still be there so
think before you allow anyone to do anything to you. Dr. Day wants you to use God's plan
which includes forgiveness of your sins, which means you must forgive others, then healing
can begin. We all know when we have done wrong, just make it right, and don't carry anger
around. She wants you to view your disease as something you caused, which you must
reverse, and the cure can only come from within you. Modern medicine tends to let you off the hook to some extent and attempts to heal you artificially, independent of your lifestyle, with drugs. What you eat does determine how long you live. Seventh Day Adventists live several years longer than others, probably because they are vegetarians and eat healthier foods.
Whenever Jesus cured a person, (he
cured everyone of all their diseases by forgiving them of their sins) he commanded them to
sin no more lest a worse thing comes upon them. Now, there is no reason you could not
receive healing by a miracle of Devin healing. God never changes. But it involves not continuing to do things that caused it and the avoidance of things that cause more damage. Chemo and Radiation
destroy your immune system, which you need to be healed. Cancer cells are mutant cells. Medical physiology textbooks state that "all cancers are caused by a failure of the immune system to destroy mutant cells". Obviously, the workable solution for cancer is to strengthen the immune system of the body! The Pharmaceutical giants go around trying to convince us that only they can cure you; your immune system is not capable of doing its job...So, it is a useless cure that depresses the immune system while trying to "cure" a disease caused by a failure of the immune system. You must start to investigate for
yourself. Doctors admit that they do not know how to cure cancer. All they can do is cut,
poison or burn it out potentially causing your body a lot of harm, according to Dr. Day.
Alternative Therapies and Case Histories
I don't know about you, but in my neighborhood I have seen too
many people dying of cancers (and circulatory diseases) of various kinds. I don't believe there is a family around today who has not been touched by this nasty family destroying disease, including my mother. Before you
accept treatment for say Cancer, HIV, or Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, (catch phrase for
"we don't know the cause") ask the doctor what his batting average is. The cure
rate where we live is terrible. My son's friend's father, dead from colon cancer;
daughter's friend's mother, dead from breast cancer, another of her friend's father, dying
(update: dead) of brain cancer; wife's friend battling uterine cancer for the second time,
and on and on. (And, on Christmas Eve 2000, my son's friend's dad, who had been treated
for heart problems before, dropped dead of a massive heart attack leaving a wife and two
nice teenaged twin boys behind.) Although I hate to be negative, I am wondering why these
people were not cured. We are told that life spans are increasing, but my senses tell me
this is not so since all diseases have increased, not decreased. So they are just playing
with statistics and all the increased survival rates are at the front end. There are fewer
babies and mothers dying at childbirth. You would expect at least half to be cured, with
all this talk of modern drugs and methods. The simple fact is, there are protocols that
work better than drugs for the top killers.
Just a brief word about AIDS, which has become a big business. The
AIDS researchers are basically at the public trough, and you can't get them away.
Unfortunately it too has become a scam with AIDS patients as the victims. The problem is
that many second-rate researchers found themselves in an excellent position to suck a
living from the dying bodies of poor AIDS victims. There is a lot of evidence the HIV
virus is not the cause, or the main cause, of the disease - and the fact that key persons
have chickened out from discussing the topic publicly, is enough to implicate them. You
see, they claim there is this other herpes virus that has been found in the organs
affected in the disease - and the HIV was not there at all. Top Researcher in AIDS
Politics and Money$
by Geoffrey Rogers
Geoffrey Rogers filmed the investigative
documentary, Ozone and the Politics of Medicine, in five different countries over seven
years. gathering clinical and scientific evidence supporting the use of ozone in medicine.
It has since won awards at three international film festivals. The Academy of Motion
Picture Arts and Sciences recently selected it as one of the outstanding documentaries of
1994. It has also been refused by CBC, CTV, PBS and other networks and has yet to be
The above Networks have many drug companies
I began researching ozone therapy almost 10
years ago, after my father became the first doctor in Canada to use the treatment. It has
fascinated me primarily because of the staggering implications for modern medicine, but
also because it has been largely ignored in North America.
For almost a century, ozone has been used
to safely sterilize water. Today it is acknowledged as the very best method available. And
for almost 100 years, doctors and scientists have been discovering benefits from its use
in medicine. Yet why has it taken so long for ozone to come to the attention of the modern
Because ozone is invisible and highly
unstable, early research was difficult. It is a natural gas and easy to make, thus lacking
appeal as a proprietary medicine. As a result, it has been championed by doctors (good for
you docs) and not by drug companies, and the majority of the data represents doctors'
findings rather than derived from scientific or sponsored studies. Peer-reviewed journals
are the gatekeepers of information for the scientific mainstream and many will only accept
data from controlled studies. Doctors' findings are routinely dismissed as
"anecdotal" unless the data was gathered in a controlled repeatable manner. No
other medications can be used by the patients. There must be a consistency in the
condition being treated and there must be enough patients to indicate a pattern.
In Germany where doctors are allowed to use
any treatment they wish, ozone has not had to pass the scrutiny of federal regulatory
officials. Consequently only a handful of the hundreds of medical papers from Germany have
been based on controlled studies none of them by the government.
But it would be a mistake to discount the
extensive experience of so many doctors. A 1980 survey, reyiewed by the German Society of
Pathologists, found that 90 per cent of therapists that treated 384,000 different patients
reported "good" to "'very good" results. The incidence of side-effects
was .0007 per cent per treatment, one of the lowest for any medical treatment!
Several hundred delegates attended the 12th
World Ozone Congress in France in May, 1995, coordinated by the International Ozone
Association. Held every other year, the congresses are primarily concerned with commercial
purification of water with ozone, although medical applications are also addressed.
This year doctors and scientists from
Germany, Cuba, Russia, Italy and other countries presented studies indicating benefit in
the treatment of glaucoma, brain strokes, ischemic and cardiopathy, sports and preventive
medicine, cancer, circulatory disorders. orthopedics, pediatrics, intestinal immune system
disorders, disease of the joints, rheumatoid arthritis, neurodermatitis, genital diseases,
dermatological conditions, threatened pregnancies, deafness and other conditions.
The director of the Cuban Center For Ozone Research estimated more than 30,000 people
have now been treated in government hospitals and clinics. A Russian delegate estimated
more than 100,000 people have been treated there with ozone. Millions have been treated in
Germany, where thousands of machines are being used daily. And yet in North America. the
treatment is available only in the underground.
In 1987 the Canadian military began
research into ozone's potential to sterilize blood with very exciting results, including
inactivation of the HIV virus, without harming healthy white blood cells in-vitro. A 100
per cent safe sterilization of contaminated blood transfusions in a major monkey study was
completed in 1993. A second monkey study was completed this year at Cornell University,
financed by the Canadian government. The International Red Cross has known for years about
the Canadian research and yet has released no information publicly.
In the United States, the story is more
ominous. The US National Institutes of Health have so far failed to research ozone, and
even the NIH Office of Alternative Medicine has neglected to include it in its modest but
eclectic studies of alternative therapies.
Despite extensive data submitted to the US
Food and Drug Administration, in May 1993 the FDA Director for AIDS Coordination testified
before a US Congressional sub-committee and stated that ozone had no medical value and was
instead an example of medical fraud. To date there has been no public retraction from the
FDA on the matter. Disturbing too has been the refusal of the national media to properly
investigate the situation. Even after reviewing Ozone and the Politics of Medicine,
producers at CBC and NBC both came out with stories that completely ignored the scientific
evidence and instead questioned ozone's validity.
In Canada and the United States,
doctors risk their licenses for using unapproved therapies. Although Ottawa will grant
approval for experimental usage on the patient-by-patient basis, the process is unwieldy
and clearly inhibits doctors from considering alternative therapies. Ozone will remain
unapproved in both countries until expensive studies are done proving safety and
effectiveness for a particular ozone protocol. No one knows when that may happen.
Year after year, the medical and scientific
evidence accumulates, presumably until the sheer weight of it will burst the bubble of
ignorance and the mainstream will eventually "discover" it, research it and
Meanwhile, ozone use is mushrooming in the
grassroots, both in Canada and the United States, as desperate people search for hope.
It's time to recognize the treatment and establish standards.
The cycle of drug funding, development, and payback was begun
early in the last century. Rockefeller benevolently funded medical research, put his men
on the University boards, and so no other protocols regardless of efficacy were ever
funded. Now, things are changing slowly, and there are many places in Canada and the
United States where you can get ozone therapy.
The Breath of Life
Ozone is probably not something you think about very often. It probably only crosses
your mind when you open a can of deodorant or furniture spray and briefly worry about that
hole in the 'ozone layer' - the protective layer of gas surrounding the earth which
environmentalists are always telling us about.
But ozone is also the vital element in a therapy now being used to treat a wide range
of conditions - heart and circulatory diseases, cancers, immune disorders and infections.
Over here it's still relatively unknown - but in Germany alone there are over 5000
Ozone is an 'unstable' form of oxygen which can be created using
an electric charge, or naturally in the atmosphere. As well as being found in the upper
atmosphere where it shields us from harmful ultraviolet radiation, ozone is also used to
purify drinking water in cities around the world: Montreal, Paris, Moscow and Los Angeles,
to name a few. But because of ozone's high profile as either water disinfectant or Eco-headache,
its therapeutic properties are still overlooked.
Oxygen and Ozone Benefits
Oxygen is both the giver and sustainer of life. Our bodies use
oxygen through the process of oxidation, breathing it in and breaking it down like any
other nutrient into a form which can be used by the blood cells. About 90 per cent of the
body's energy is created by oxygen. It regulates every activity of the human organism,
from brain function and digestion through to the ability to think and feel. Many diseases
- including the ones mentioned above - are thought to have their root cause in an
insufficiency of oxygen.
Ozone therapy uses a mixture of normal oxygen and its unstable form, ozone. Ozone
dissolves 15 times faster in the blood than normal oxygen, so the mixture improves the
blood's viscosity and enhances the circulation. Once it's in the blood, the ozone's extra
molecule oxygen sticks to anything without antioxidant protection. Healthy cells have this
protection built in, but viruses, fungi and bacteria do not. Weakened by the ozone, they
become susceptible to the body's natural defenses.
The most common way of introducing ozone into the blood is by a process known as 'major
autohemotherapy'. The treatment is remarkably simple. One hundred millilitres of blood -
about a teacup's worth - is removed from the patient and stored in an infusion bottle.
Then, a mixture of oxygen-ozone (99.95 % oxygen to 0.05 % ozone produced by passing oxygen
through an electric field) is forced into the the bottle and mixed by gentle shaking. As
ozone molecules dissolve into the blood they give up oxygen atoms, which attack viruses
and bacteria - anything without antioxidant protection - but don't harm the blood (when
administered according to a strict protocol). The strengthened blood is reintroduced
intravenously into the patient and imparts some of the disinfecting properties to the rest
of their blood as it's circulated.
In 1989 GP Dr. Simi Khanna, felt so ill that she was forced to give up her medical
practice and spent nine months in and out of hospitals fighting a fever and arthritis
which left her almost completely immobile. She was so ill that at one stage she was
diagnosed with lymphoma - mis-diagnosed, as it turned out. Oxygen-ozone therapy was
brought to her attention by a colleague, so Dr. Khanna sent a blood sample to a clinic in
Germany. Soon, she received word that oxygen-ozone therapy would help her get well, and
was helped onto a plane. It was a last resort.
'When I went to Germany I thought I was dying,' says Dr. Khanna. 'I was in a lot of
pain, and I could barely move. My program of therapy included diet, supplements,
physiotherapy and ozone therapy. All the things helped but the oxygen-ozone therapy made
the difference - on days when I didn't get it the pain and fever would come back.
Dr. Khanna began to feel better after a month of treatment, and with three months she
returned to Britain feeling greatly improved. Later she returned to Germany for another
month of treatment, but also to begin training in oxygen-ozone therapy herself. Today, she
practices the therapy at her clinic in Richmond, Surrey. 'There's no doubt in my mind that
oxygen-ozone therapy saved my life.' says Dr. Khanna, 'and it helps many of my patients
too. It's a very versatile therapy.'
Over 23,000 licensed health practitioners on the continent now use autohemotherapy and
other applications of oxygen-ozone in their practices, either alone or as a complement to
other therapies. They treat patients for circulatory and heart problems, colonic
disorders, cancers, auto-immune diseases, burns, ulcers, arthritis, and fungal, bacterial
and viral infections - including HIV. Oxygen-ozone therapy remains largely unknown in the
One conspiracy theory is that drug companies ensure that the
public is kept in the dark. After all, no one can patent oxygen, it can't be stored, and
the equipment needed to produce it is relatively cheap. But a more likely reason for the
low profile of oxygen therapies is that the treatments are not offered by many UK
therapists. There were only 13 clinics listed by the first British conference on oxygen
therapies in 1994.
Bad press is also cited by doctors and naturopaths as being partly responsible for
ozone therapy's low profile - some accuse the British media of scaremongering. On June 5,
1994, The Independent on Sunday ran an article headlined 'Health fears over doctors' use
of ozone,' which claimed the Department of Health (DoH) had begun an investigation into
oxygen therapies. However, DoH spokesperson Susan Givens called it 'puzzling.' 'We don't
investigate people or therapies,' she told HH. 'General clinicians can prescribe what's
required and DoH doesn't attempt to prejudice clinical decisions.'
Treatments are given on an out-patient basis. Very mild side effects - skin reaction -
have been reported, but are very rare. People who shouldn't use oxygen-ozone therapy
include those who've recently had a heart attack or internal bleeding; people with
hyperthyroidism, and those whose platelet count is low. 'Oxygen-ozone therapy is part of a
holistic approach and each person is treated according to their needs,' says Dr. Khanna.
Symptoms of MS
Paula, 43, discovered
oxygen-ozone therapy relieved the symptoms of multiple sclerosis (MS).
'Three years ago I began experiencing numbness and tingling in my
hands and feet, vision problems, loss of power and coordination, and had difficulty
working. I knew it was multiple sclerosis even before it was diagnosed, because my dad
died from MS and I saw what he went through.
I didn't accept my neurologist's opinion that I could do nothing, so I began
investigating possible treatments. Eventually, I read about oxygen-ozone therapy and
contacted Dr. Khanna. After a thorough examination, Dr. Khanna explained what was wrong
and recommended oxygen-ozone because, among other things, it's an immune stimulant which
is also virucidal and enhances the circulatory system, which seemed ideal.
I began weekly autohemotherapy treatments, improved my diet and took daily mineral
supplements. At first the oxygen-ozone stirred up the toxins in my body and I felt awful.
But within four weeks I had more energy than I'd had in years. Gradually, the numbness and
tingling stopped, my vision improved and within two months my left leg, which had been
almost useless, was working again.
I am convinced that if it hadn't been for Dr. Khanna's expertise and my hard work, I'd
be in a wheelchair today. As it is, I'm feeling fit and well and lead a full and active
13 January 1995 Dear Mr. XXXXXXX In response to your request for my opinion
on ozone therapy as it relates to the medical management of AIDS patients, the attached is
forwarded for your information and further use as required. It is respectfully requested that, should
this material be passed on to other media groups, it be reproduced in its entirety. Please feel free to contact me at any time
regarding our progress with the Cornell Study. Best wishes M.E. Shannon, Cmdre Deputy Surgeon General
Notwithstanding the negative findings of
Dr. Garber's 1991 clinical trial, I firmly believe that ozone therapy has potential to
play a valuable role in the medical management of AIDS. From a regulatory point of view,
it is clear that not all forms of ozone therapy will be considered sufficiently safe
and/or efficacious in this regard; however, there is no doubt in my mind that a protocol
will eventually emerge with proven benefit. Looking back at my past experience with
minor autohemotherapy in the treatment of AIDS, there still remains a discrepancy between
the Phase 1a and 1b trial results, which may, in part, relate to the lack of sophisticated
technology to control for O3 concentrations in both trials. Given the lack of any
significant therapeutic breakthroughs in the treatment of AIDS since that ill-fated trial
and the growing testimonial support for its efficacy, the need for further clinical
research with Ozone is certainly indicated. It is indeed unfortunate that the North
American medical community and its funding agencies could not take a more neutral stance
on this subject; tragically, professional opinion has been somewhat polarized on this
issue. I believe that it is time to take the emotion out of the arguments, both pro and
con, and commence a systematic examination of the evidence currently available on the
merits of this therapy. Where information gaps exist (particularly in peer-reviewed
scientific studies) which might preclude any regulatory decision on the validity of
certain claims, properly designed research initiatives should be encouraged with the same
kind of public support normally afforded any other scientific endeavor of this import. Although I have my doubts that ozone will
ever be shown to have certain curative value on AIDS, I am certain that its
well-documented analgesic effects and hence, its potential impact on patient well-being
and quality of life, will someday be recognized. In this regard, I understand that both
the FDA and the National Institute of Health are presently reviewing the therapeutic
merits of ozone as part of their program to investigate a number of "alternative
approaches" to AIDS therapy. I have the utmost confidence that in their continued
pursuit of an answer to this problem, ozone will receive the scientific attention and
support it rightfully deserves. Dr. Gabe Mirkin stated on January 28, 1999
that preliminary studies have shown that MS is associated with a virus. If this is true it
seems that more and more diseases are shown to be bacterial or viral in origin. So there
is hope that any efficacious therapy that kills
viral particles and bacteria would be valuable. See (watercure2.com) Drug companies have their place, but they
should put people first, not profits. Evidence shows that ozone research has been blocked
by threat of withdrawal of research funds.
I do not agree with Dr. Mirkin's opinion
that EDTA Chelation Therapy is of no use. There are enough patients who tried it while
awaiting amputations and heart surgery who did not require them after chelation that it is
convincing to me. I have listened to radio shows as well and people phoning in telling of
their experiences, that it can't be discounted. (I am listening to a show right now, and a
patient is saying that he was a mess and now he is totally healthy. He is saying that a
by-pass operation costs 5 or 6 times as much as Chelation. There you go back to money
Bioethics of vaccination $
$ Immunization is big
business and the world is divided into two types of people: those who believe in
immunization and those that don't. What is the case for each? Do the kids in the Canadian
band Moffats really understand what they are promoting? (Hep B vaccine)
The 20/20 TV broadcast of January 22, 1999
confirmed the worst fears of many people, that there was definitely something drastically
wrong. Apparently, the parents are not told of the risks of vaccination, or even the risks
of getting the disease. Why fix it if it ain't broke? Nor do children have the choice in
36 states, under threat of being expelled from school. The parents of the children hurt by
the vaccine want a choice. France has withdrawn compulsory vaccination after evidence of
neurological damage. The best way to handle compulsory vaccination refusal is to bring a
form with you for the school etc. to sign that says they take full responsibility if there
is a problem . They usually back off. Oh by the way, while the Mad Cow Disease scandal
rocked the world, England was shipping bovine vaccine base to America and other countries. By the time it became known in America, they did not simply recall it. They let everyone
use up stocks despite the great risks of nvCJD
or human mad cow disease. So this business has many dark sides.
Most people know of someone who has been affected by not being
immunized, and therefore many believe in it without question. This is understandable. Most
doctors believe in it. So why is there a controversy? Should people have a choice whether
or not to immunize with a particular vaccine with a poor record of side-effects? There is
a growing army of objectors who want to use natural methods such as exposure* who do not
feel the risk of the disease is great enough to justify the risk of the vaccine. Plus,
many people feel that our kids are getting enough shots already, and they don't want more.
There is also the question: will vaccination be the next tragedy, like tainted blood? Will you believe their next marketing (scare) tactic?
Did you know that if the vaccine is given to a baby, and he or she dies, you have no
recourse, and no support? Many say investigators do not blame the vaccine, but blame the
parents; and of course cause and effect are impossible to prove. Have all the deaths even
been documented? 20/20 mentioned several post-vaccination infant deaths, which were labeled SID (Sudden Infant Death syndrome) deaths, but which
upon further inspection, were caused by the vaccine. How many more are there? (cause and
effect are mainly researched by drug companies, who report no connection - hmm, so did the
tobacco companies with respect to cancer.) Also, a frightening statistic is looming:
millions of kids who have possibly acquired a food allergy from a vaccine! (e.g. eggs)
Some teachers are telling children they could die if they don't
get the vaccine. Is it ethical for a teacher to give children medical advice? Could she be
Fact: There were 12 incidents of polio in
Canada since 1980, and 11 have been from the vaccine itself, and one was imported. In the
US, there are 10 polio cases per year, all associated with the vaccine, which is now the
only way to get the disease. Did you know that the makers of the polio vaccine wished to
hurry up the vaccination program before the disease died out naturally? What do these
statistics mean to you? Would we be better off without it?
Perhaps kids should be tested for allergic reactions before
getting the shots. Think back at some physical problems some people have had in the past.
How close was the problem to an event such as vaccination? Think about it - don't just get
shot. If, after researching the pros and cons, you still believe it in the best interests
of your kids, go ahead shoot 'em up.
September 1998 issue #191 pg. 7 of Alive magazine states that
research scientists believe that a diabetes epidemic in New Zealand was caused by hep B
vaccination of infants. (New Zealand Medical Journal, May 24, 1996) US studies
point to the same conclusions. This same vaccine is used now in Canada, and promoted by a
popular kids' band, the Moffats .
How Vaccines are Made
Specific vaccine viruses and bacteria are
grown in pig or horse blood, rabbit brain tissue, chicken and duck eggs and calf serum.
When such foreign proteins have not been filtered through the body's normal assimilation
and elimination process, they can be highly toxic in the lymphatic and blood systems.
Also, the United States Government allowed batches of British vaccines to be used up even
though they knew the danger. The vaccines were made from cow blood, possibly from mad
$ Bill Gates donated $100 million dollars for third world vaccination.
Alive magazine states that the Juvenile
Diabetes Foundation of Canada does not mention the connection between vaccination and
juvenile diabetes, which has already been proven. (How many people do you know with
juvenile diabetes? Did they get it after immunization? They can also get it if they are
allergic to milk. The antibodies attack the pancreas, which has similar protein to milk.)
Instead, they push for more dollars (sounds familiar). For JDF to do otherwise would be a
conflict of interest, says Rhody Lake of Alive Magazine. What do you think?
Natural Immunization through exposure:
*If a child is healthy, but not
in first or second year. That's why we hear of reactions to immunization of babies.
Note: (Feb. 8, 2004) The above warning about vaccines was written six years ago. Today mercury in vaccines has been implicated in autism and other neurological diseases.
"Just a little off
the top, er...end, doc please."
Routine circumcision of babies:
Doctors in the United States and Canada
have routinely circumcised baby boys for hundreds of years. What year is this? I remind
you we have reached 2000's! We condemn others for circumcising little girls, and what do
we do? We mutilate our little
boy babies. Unless you are a Jew, there is no (Christian) basis for it. Now American
doctors are coming around - the news is out, you don't have to cut off a part of your
baby's body for a boost in the doctor's paycheck. Why, he had to come out on call for
this, so give him an extra bonus. And by golly, God did have a purpose for it, it wasn't
just a mistake we had to correct. Nurses in Victoria BC, Canada nearly came publicly
against the practice but backed out at the last minute. The medical establishment (who do
a lot of good to be sure when they aren't knife happy) likes to tamper with genitalia, and
believe they know what is "normal" and too many men want their boys to look like
them. Pretty poor reasons for cutting up a perfectly good, intact baby. For what it's
"If its so good I'm sure every
doctor and reporter would jump at it"
Nothing could be further from the truth.
Two years after the Wright Brothers first flew their heavier-than-air airplane, the Scientific American magazine stated to the effect that if there
was any truth to these rumors, considering the nature of reporters, wouldn't they jump at
this news and the papers would be full of it. Being ignored by the press cannot be used as
proof of anything. Press reports are highly selective in topic and often biased. However,
when the government makes a statement, reporters jump on it, thereby drowning out the
voices of the people. More often than not, the government reports are flawed in some way
due to the inefficient, even corrupt, nature of governments.
Doctors' medication decisions are often
tied to the big drug companies. Until this changes, cheap, efficacious alternatives will
have to wait. But if you look hard enough, you will find practitioners right in your own
backyard who have discovered Ozone and are using it successfully. Just remember one thing:
it's proven safer than drugs. When ozone makes contact with the water in your blood, it
converts tiny amounts to a natural antibiotic H2O2 which, believe it
or not, is a natural substance found in your body in tiny amounts anyway, especially in
mother's milk. Do drugs have their place? Of course. But what we are talking about here is
the blocking of other, cheap, safe, often better treatments which would be of help to the
rich and poor alike, all over the world. This information
is blocked higher up, but is spreading like wild fire at the grass roots.
Bibliography: (Pau D'Arco, Taheebo, LaPacho are made from the same cancer fighting South American bark)
Bible says Christ forgives all our sins and heals all our diseases if we keep His commandments. How many that came to
Jesus to be healed did he turn away? None. He forgave them and healed them, and told them to sin no more. Whatever made us sick we must stop doing.
Is Jesus the same yesterday, today and tomorrow? Then he will heal you!
DISCLAIMER: All writings are purely the
opinion of this author, and although meant to offer help and guidance, should not be
considered as medical advice or in lieu of the recommendations of an attending physician
or other health care professional. The information in links are not necessarily the
opinions of the writer.